Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreGayatri Balasamy dissent warns against judicial overreach in arbitration, affirming that award modification undermines party autonomy and international enforceability.
Singapore courts balance party autonomy and creditor protection, refining how arbitration and cross-border insolvency coexist in evolving jurisprudence.
Iran restricts foreign law in courts but allows it in arbitration; parties must prove its content, as judges and arbitrators...
Russia's top court curtails international arbitration for sanctioned entities, reinforcing national jurisdiction and challenging cross-border contract enforcement.
Discover how leadership perceptions vs. real values shape global B2B success—Part 6 reveals the power of empathy, trust & inclusion in cross-cultural business.
Read moreThe article questions the interaction points legal professionals have with their clients. It takes you a step back and asks...
The article discusses recent Australian legal developments, especially the Rinehart case, highlighting how it broadens the scope of multi-party arbitration...
The Mediation and Arbitration Center Mauritius (MARC) and Jus Mundi have formed an exclusive partnership to globally share non-confidential MARC...
Arbitration Year in Review 2024 – Spain: ECT withdrawal, investment arbitration updates, key court rulings on enforcement, and major reforms...
Examining the clash between arbitration and insolvency in restructuring: lessons from Singapore, India, and the UK on carve-outs and creditor...
© 2023 Jus Mundi