The Pitfalls of Challenging Arbitral Awards on Apparent Bias: DJK v DJN
Singapore High Court in DJK v DJN reaffirms strict test for apparent bias in arbitration, guiding parties on pitfalls in...
Singapore High Court in DJK v DJN reaffirms strict test for apparent bias in arbitration, guiding parties on pitfalls in...
Singapore leads in AI-driven arbitration: exploring legal research, translation, case management, and governance to enhance fairness and efficiency.
SIAC and Jus Mundi partner to deliver AI and legal tech training, empowering arbitration users to harness technology in dispute...
Exploring how courts interpret “may” in arbitration clauses—India vs global views—and why precise drafting matters to avoid disputes.
From WIPO to SIAC, arbitration is rising as the preferred path for IP disputes, balancing confidentiality, speed, and enforceability worldwide.
Judicial evolution in India affirms tribunal autonomy to implead non-signatories, but the Arbitration Amendment Bill 2024 leaves statutory recognition absent.
From HKIAC caseload growth to CIETAC’s global rise, experts reveal how China-related disputes are reshaping arbitration and what London can...
India’s Supreme Court in Gayatri sparks debate by allowing limited award modifications under Sections 34 & 37, raising arbitral autonomy...
Can smart contracts hold up in arbitration? Explore global legal perspectives and what they mean for enforceability in digital dispute...
Asian corporate arbitration trends discussed at LIDW: exit cases, jurisdictional dynamics, and the role of disputes counsel in deal structuring.
Michele Sonen joins Jus Mundi as Head of APAC – bringing regional insight, international expertise, and a clear vision for...
Singapore–Bahrain cross-border appeals model sets new precedent in judicial cooperation, blending sovereignty with international commercial court innovation.
© 2023 Jus Mundi