Ultra Petita and Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in Chile
What does ultra petita mean for arbitral awards in Chile? The Supreme Court reinforces a restrictive approach to judicial intervention.
What does ultra petita mean for arbitral awards in Chile? The Supreme Court reinforces a restrictive approach to judicial intervention.
MXVYAP relaunches in Mexico, bringing young arbitration practitioners together for intergenerational exchange, career development, and collaboration.
France's annulment landscape is shifting: Astaris v Venezuela limits new jurisdictional arguments, departing from Schooner, as reform leaves Article 1466...
An analysis of the Santiago Court of Appeals' unprecedented decision to annul an international commercial award and its impact on...
When annulment and enforcement overlap: examining procedural duplication in Guatemala’s framework for domestic arbitral awards.
2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Guatemala reviews ISDS cases, court decisions, mining and energy disputes, and local arbitral institutions.
2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Chile covers CAM Santiago’s CIAM-CIAR alliance, court challenges, and key investment arbitration developments.
Bolivia’s 2025 arbitration year in review: landmark financial disputes, dispute board modernization, constitutional court support, and hydrocarbons claims.
2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Mexico examines judicial reform, ADR developments, USMCA review, ISDS cases, and key arbitral precedents.
Peru’s 2025 arbitration year in review: key ICSID claims, annulment proceedings, public procurement disputes, award enforcement, RENACE reforms, and new...
2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Colombia covers treaty updates, major proceedings, enforcement arbitration reform, and new state arbitration guidelines.
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
© Jus Mundi