Spotlight on DMZ v DNA: Singapore Court of Appeal Clarifies Court Intervention in Arbitration
When can Singapore courts step in during arbitration? This decision reinforces Article 5 of the UNCITRAL Model Law and limits...
When can Singapore courts step in during arbitration? This decision reinforces Article 5 of the UNCITRAL Model Law and limits...
Singapore International Commercial Court upholds arbitral award in USD 14.7M dispute, rejecting natural justice challenge to valuation methodology.
SIAC’s new RIA Protocol introduces the first institutional arbitration framework tailored to restructuring and insolvency disputes, marking a major shift...
In a landmark decision, Singapore’s court rejected Russia’s immunity plea, confirming enforcement of the $50 billion Yukos awards under the...
Jus Mundi’s Jus AI powered a candid discussion at Singapore Convention Week with Dentons Rodyk on trust, ethics, and the...
By adopting Jus Mundi’s Jus AI, WongPartnership advances its arbitration practice, blending human insight with AI precision to redefine excellence.
Singapore Court of Appeal in Voltas v York reaffirms finality in arbitration, ruling tribunals functus officio once a final award...
Singapore Court of Appeal in Gonzalo Gil White v. Oro Negro clarifies limits of anti-suit injunctions, reinforcing contractual covenants and...
Singapore High Court in DJK v DJN reaffirms strict test for apparent bias in arbitration, guiding parties on pitfalls in...
Singapore leads in AI-driven arbitration: exploring legal research, translation, case management, and governance to enhance fairness and efficiency.
SIAC and Jus Mundi partner to deliver AI and legal tech training, empowering arbitration users to harness technology in dispute...
Exploring how courts interpret “may” in arbitration clauses—India vs global views—and why precise drafting matters to avoid disputes.
© 2023 Jus Mundi