DOI v. DOJ and others [2025] SGHC(I) 15: A Progressive Dimension of International Arbitration
In DOI v. DOJ, Singapore's SICC set aside an award for apparent bias, finding the tribunal had copied reasoning from...
In DOI v. DOJ, Singapore's SICC set aside an award for apparent bias, finding the tribunal had copied reasoning from...
In MSA Global, the Delhi High Court treats an arbitrator's non-disclosure as a standalone public policy ground, diverging from the...
Singapore Academy of Law and Jus Mundi sign an MOU to expand global access to Singapore arbitration scholarship and legal...
How WongPartnership uses Jus AI to speed up arbitrator research, investment treaty analysis, and get to strategy faster with verifiable,...
Explore how the Indian Supreme Court uses estoppel to uphold arbitral awards when parties silently participate past an expired contractual...
Singapore High Court ruling DLS v DTL SGHC 61 clarifies arbitral awards vs. interim orders and the 3-month deadline for...
India’s Mylandla judgment marks a first step toward transnational issue estoppel, strengthening cross-border finality in award enforcement.
From SIAC reforms to China’s new Arbitration Law, Asia continues to strengthen its role as a leading arbitration hub.
Arbitration at a turning point: six trends from global data reveal a market reshaped by AI, geopolitics, and new hubs.
Alphard SGHC 154 clarifies when Singapore courts may grant interim relief against non-parties in arbitration.
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
When can Singapore courts step in during arbitration? This decision reinforces Article 5 of the UNCITRAL Model Law and limits...
© Jus Mundi