Who Really Decided the Case? Tribunal Assistance and the Verification Gap in Arbitration
Explore when tribunal assistance becomes improper delegation, and how disclosure and verification can protect the integrity of arbitral awards.
Explore when tribunal assistance becomes improper delegation, and how disclosure and verification can protect the integrity of arbitral awards.
What does Vietnam’s Decision 33 mean for award enforcement? The Hanoi People’s Court addresses merits review and public policy.
English and Australian courts confirm that ratifying the New York Convention does not by itself waive state immunity from award...
German BGH allows third-party notices to arbitrators in set-aside proceedings, clarifying recourse, remittal, and potential arbitrator liability.
A practical guide to enforcing local arbitral awards in Türkiye, from setting aside and enforceability certificates to interim measures.
What does ultra petita mean for arbitral awards in Chile? The Supreme Court reinforces a restrictive approach to judicial intervention.
In DOI v. DOJ, Singapore's SICC set aside an award for apparent bias, finding the tribunal had copied reasoning from...
Does ratifying the New York Convention waive state immunity? In Devas v. India, the English Court of Appeal says no,...
Part 5 of Middle East Arbitration: 50 Moments That Shaped 2025 covers Abu Dhabi and ADGM rulings, SCCA e-signatures, and...
Part 4 of Middle East Arbitration: 50 Moments That Shaped 2025 turns to the DIFC, covering seat, public policy, interim...
France's annulment landscape is shifting: Astaris v Venezuela limits new jurisdictional arguments, departing from Schooner, as reform leaves Article 1466...
In MSA Global, the Delhi High Court treats an arbitrator's non-disclosure as a standalone public policy ground, diverging from the...
© Jus Mundi