Enforcing the Invisible: Arbitral Awards Involving Crypto and Digital Assets in the United Arab Emirates
How do UAE courts enforce crypto-asset arbitral awards? Uncover the legal challenges and the shift from traditional property rights to...
How do UAE courts enforce crypto-asset arbitral awards? Uncover the legal challenges and the shift from traditional property rights to...
Explore how the expanding EU sanctions regime impacts commercial disputes and the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Lithuanian courts.
Hong Kong Court refuses to set aside an arbitral award, reaffirming its pro-arbitration stance and rejecting a public policy challenge...
How the Indian Supreme Court's Velusamy ruling impacts the New York Convention, creating new cross-border enforcement hurdles for late arbitral...
Paris Court of Appeal rejects document production request in ICC award annulment, affirming strict evidentiary standards for procedural fraud in...
As Africa modernises its arbitration frameworks, institutional growth and mining reforms are redefining the continent's dispute resolution landscape.
UK Supreme Court rules on ICSID awards and state immunity: adjudicative immunity cannot block recognition, but executing against sovereign assets...
Singapore High Court ruling DLS v DTL SGHC 61 clarifies arbitral awards vs. interim orders and the 3-month deadline for...
Nordic Arbitration Day 2026 explored case management, sanctions, expert evidence, virtual hearings, and arbitrator appointments in Stockholm.
From investment arbitration to award enforcement, 2025 French court decisions delivered important guidance for arbitration practitioners worldwide.
Paris Arbitration Week: Signature Litigation’s panel explored global enforcement tactics, asset tracing, exequatur, insolvency risks, and recovery strategy.
India’s Supreme Court applies transnational issue estoppel to prevent award debtors from relitigating merits at the enforcement stage.
© Jus Mundi