Arbitration Across the Pacific: Lessons from the Asia–Latin America Corridor
A Singapore panel examines the growing Asia–Latin America arbitration corridor, from infrastructure and mining disputes to enforcement and cultural divides.
A Singapore panel examines the growing Asia–Latin America arbitration corridor, from infrastructure and mining disputes to enforcement and cultural divides.
What does Vietnam’s Decision 33 mean for award enforcement? The Hanoi People’s Court addresses merits review and public policy.
Morocco VYAP reflects on a year of partnerships, regional events, and mentorship initiatives shaping the next generation of arbitration practitioners.
India-Pakistan Indus Waters dispute: the PCA addresses treaty continuity, competing forums, interim measures, and the limits of arbitral jurisdiction.
CORD’s new arbitration rules combine AI accountability, financial consequences for delay, tiered fees, and optional review of awards.
English and Australian courts confirm that ratifying the New York Convention does not by itself waive state immunity from award...
Defence disputes are emerging as a new arbitration practice area, shaped by sanctions, export controls, classified evidence, and complex international...
Sports arbitration is evolving beyond party autonomy. Explore CAS, lex sportiva, judicial oversight, and procedural fairness in global sport.
German BGH allows third-party notices to arbitrators in set-aside proceedings, clarifying recourse, remittal, and potential arbitrator liability.
A practical guide to enforcing local arbitral awards in Türkiye, from setting aside and enforceability certificates to interim measures.
What does ultra petita mean for arbitral awards in Chile? The Supreme Court reinforces a restrictive approach to judicial intervention.
MXVYAP relaunches in Mexico, bringing young arbitration practitioners together for intergenerational exchange, career development, and collaboration.
© Jus Mundi