How Far Can an Arbitral Tribunal Reach? India’s Unsettled Law on Third Parties
From Cox & Kings to ASF and HPCL: Ηow India's courts diverge on who decides that a non-signatory is bound,...
Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.
India
Non-Disclosure as an Independent Ground for Public Policy Challenge: A Step Too Far for the Indian Enforcement Regime?
In MSA Global, the Delhi High Court treats an arbitrator's non-disclosure as a standalone public policy ground, diverging from the...
When the State Cannot Identify the Proper Forum: Lessons from the Antrix–Devas Saga
What happens when a state cannot identify the proper forum? The Antrix–Devas saga raises questions of denial of justice, FET,...
The Document Speaks for Itself
How mandatory Redfern Schedules can discipline document production, boost transparency, and narrow disputes in ODR and cross-border arbitration.
When Participation Speaks Louder Than Protest: India’s Two-Track Approach to Arbitral Mandate Preservation
Explore how the Indian Supreme Court uses estoppel to uphold arbitral awards when parties silently participate past an expired contractual...
The 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules: Key Changes and Practical Lessons for Indian Parties
The 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules bring highly expedited procedures and expanded emergency relief, shifting drafting and enforcement strategies for Indian...
The Losing Party’s New Weapon: Section 9 After Home Care Retail Marts
Following Home Care Retail Marts, unsuccessful parties in Indian arbitrations can now leverage Section 9 post-award, creating new hurdles for...
The India Practice That Is Facing the Wrong Direction: Reconfiguring Spain
The EU-India FTA opens a narrow window for Spanish law firms to escape the execution-node trap and capture high-value strategic...
Neither Void Nor Binding: What India’s Velusamy Does to an Award Abroad
How the Indian Supreme Court's Velusamy ruling impacts the New York Convention, creating new cross-border enforcement hurdles for late arbitral...
Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award: Indian Supreme Court Invokes Transnational Issue Estoppel to Bar Merits Relitigation at Enforcement Stage
India’s Supreme Court applies transnational issue estoppel to prevent award debtors from relitigating merits at the enforcement stage.
India’s Judicial Power to Modify Arbitral Awards and Its Compatibility With the New York Convention
India’s power to modify arbitral awards raises questions under the New York Convention, with implications for finality, enforcement, and foreign...
Transnational Issue Estoppel: India’s First Step Towards Cross-Border Finality Through the “Mylandla” Judgment
India’s Mylandla judgment marks a first step toward transnational issue estoppel, strengthening cross-border finality in award enforcement.
Follow Us