No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus
No Result
View All Result

Home Reports

Mutual Protection of Foreign Investments in BRICS Member States

16 April 2025
in Africa, Americas, Arbitration, Arbitration for In-House Counsel, Asia-Pacific, Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Europe, India, Indonesia, Investor-State Arbitration, Iran, Legal Insights, Middle East & Turkey, Reports, Russia, South Africa, UAE, World
Mutual Protection of Foreign Investments in BRICS Member States

This report, prepared by Brevia Legal, offers an in-depth public study of foreign investment protection mechanisms among the expanded BRICS membership, now comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and, as of 2025, Indonesia.

As BRICS continues to grow in economic significance —accounting for over a quarter of global FDI inflows and nearly 30% of global GDP— the absence of a unified regulatory framework for foreign investment protection has become increasingly salient. This publication maps the existing patchwork of bilateral and multilateral treaties in force among BRICS states and provides critical legal insight into the protections currently available to investors.

Key Features of the Report

  • Treaty Landscape Overview
    A systematic inventory of the 18 Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BITs“) currently in force between BRICS member states, with analysis of their evolution, coverage, and legal effect.
  • Comparative Treaty Practice
    Examination of substantive standards of protection (e.g., FET, expropriation, MFN, NT), dispute resolution provisions, and temporal scope, including sunset clauses.
  • Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
    Analysis of dispute resolution mechanisms available under existing treaties, including trends toward limitations on ISDS, use of state-to-state arbitration, and recent case outcomes.
  • Policy Trends and Treaty Reform
    Review of shifting national approaches—particularly Brazil, India, and South Africa—toward more restrictive investment treaty models aligned with public policy priorities.
  • Prospects for Harmonisation
    Discussion of potential pathways for intra-BRICS cooperation on investment protection, including model treaties, framework agreements, and approximation of domestic regulations.

This essential resource equips legal and policy professionals with practical guidance on structuring investments and offers researchers clear insights into the evolving BRICS investment landscape.

Related Posts

Damages in Arbitration Series – A Perspective from France

Damages in Arbitration Series – A Perspective from France

by Jus Mundi
20 June 2025

How are damages assessed in France-seated arbitrations? This article explores the legal foundations, quantification standards, and treatment of interest under...

Shifting of Institutional Rules in the Wake of Emergency Arbitration: An Uncharted ‘Twilight Zone’ or a Nugatory Grey Area?

Shifting of Institutional Rules in the Wake of Emergency Arbitration: An Uncharted ‘Twilight Zone’ or a Nugatory Grey Area?

by Jus Mundi
19 June 2025

Can parties switch arbitral rules after emergency arbitration but before filing a claim? This piece explores the legal twilight zone...

How In-House Counsel Can Contribute to the Efficiency of Arbitration

The Application of Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration

by Jus Connect
18 June 2025

PAW 2025 panelists unpack how arbitrators and courts apply mandatory rules in arbitration, from public policy to insolvency and interim...

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© 2023 Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Partnerships
    • Conference Reports
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Arbitration Aftermath
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Clyde & Co
      • London VYAP
      • SG VYAP
  • World
    • Africa
    • Americas
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
      • Latin America
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Jus Events
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect