No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus

by Jus Mundi

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus by Jus Mundi
No Result
View All Result

Home Reports

Mutual Protection of Foreign Investments in BRICS Member States

16 April 2025
in Africa, Americas, Arbitration, Arbitration for In-House Counsel, Asia-Pacific, Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Europe, India, Indonesia, Investor-State Arbitration, Iran, Legal Insights, Middle East & Turkey, Reports, Russia, South Africa, UAE, World
Mutual Protection of Foreign Investments in BRICS Member States

This report, prepared by Brevia Legal, offers an in-depth public study of foreign investment protection mechanisms among the expanded BRICS membership, now comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and, as of 2025, Indonesia.

As BRICS continues to grow in economic significance —accounting for over a quarter of global FDI inflows and nearly 30% of global GDP— the absence of a unified regulatory framework for foreign investment protection has become increasingly salient. This publication maps the existing patchwork of bilateral and multilateral treaties in force among BRICS states and provides critical legal insight into the protections currently available to investors.

Key Features of the Report

  • Treaty Landscape Overview
    A systematic inventory of the 18 Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BITs“) currently in force between BRICS member states, with analysis of their evolution, coverage, and legal effect.
  • Comparative Treaty Practice
    Examination of substantive standards of protection (e.g., FET, expropriation, MFN, NT), dispute resolution provisions, and temporal scope, including sunset clauses.
  • Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
    Analysis of dispute resolution mechanisms available under existing treaties, including trends toward limitations on ISDS, use of state-to-state arbitration, and recent case outcomes.
  • Policy Trends and Treaty Reform
    Review of shifting national approaches—particularly Brazil, India, and South Africa—toward more restrictive investment treaty models aligned with public policy priorities.
  • Prospects for Harmonisation
    Discussion of potential pathways for intra-BRICS cooperation on investment protection, including model treaties, framework agreements, and approximation of domestic regulations.

This essential resource equips legal and policy professionals with practical guidance on structuring investments and offers researchers clear insights into the evolving BRICS investment landscape.

Related Posts

Economic Sanctions and Unforeseeability: Imprévision, Force Majeure and Alternative Legal Mechanisms in Resolving International Arbitration Disputes

Economic Sanctions and Unforeseeability: Imprévision, Force Majeure and Alternative Legal Mechanisms in Resolving International Arbitration Disputes

by Editor
11 August 2026

When economic sanctions disrupt contracts, which legal mechanisms apply? An analysis of force majeure, hardship, and frustration in international arbitration.

The Future of Dispute Resolution: TIAC as a Forum for Digital Assets Disputes

The Future of Dispute Resolution: TIAC as a Forum for Digital Assets Disputes

by Jus Mundi
10 August 2026

Explore how Uzbekistan's TIAC provides a modern, secure, and efficient arbitration forum tailored for complex digital asset and cryptocurrency disputes.

Non-Signatory Consent, Arbitrability of Fraud, and Finality of Awards: Lessons from Nigerian Supreme Decision in EMTS v Afdin Ventures [2026]

Non-Signatory Consent, Arbitrability of Fraud, and Finality of Awards: Lessons from Nigerian Supreme Decision in EMTS v Afdin Ventures [2026]

by Jus Mundi
7 August 2026

The Nigerian Supreme Court's landmark decision in EMTS v Afdin reshapes arbitration by binding non-signatories and solidifying award enforcement across...

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Partnerships
    • Conference Reports
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Arbitration Aftermath
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Clyde & Co
      • London VYAP
      • Paris Baby Arbitration (PBA)
      • SG VYAP
      • Sciences Po TADS
      • Sygna Partners
      • Lawyering Plus
  • World
    • Africa
      • Egypt
      • Nigeria
    • Americas
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
      • Latin America
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Australia
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
      • Russia
      • Sweden
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Qatar
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Industry
    • Construction
    • Energy
      • Electric Power
      • Oil & Gas
    • Mining
    • Telecommunication
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Jus Events
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect