No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Reports
  • Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Reports
  • Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus
No Result
View All Result

Home Reports

Mutual Protection of Foreign Investments in BRICS Member States

16 April 2025
in Africa, Americas, Arbitration, Arbitration for In-House Counsel, Asia-Pacific, Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Europe, India, Indonesia, Investor-State Arbitration, Iran, Legal Insights, Middle East & Turkey, Reports, Russia, South Africa, UAE, World
Mutual Protection of Foreign Investments in BRICS Member States

This report, prepared by Brevia Legal, offers an in-depth public study of foreign investment protection mechanisms among the expanded BRICS membership, now comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and, as of 2025, Indonesia.

As BRICS continues to grow in economic significance —accounting for over a quarter of global FDI inflows and nearly 30% of global GDP— the absence of a unified regulatory framework for foreign investment protection has become increasingly salient. This publication maps the existing patchwork of bilateral and multilateral treaties in force among BRICS states and provides critical legal insight into the protections currently available to investors.

Key Features of the Report

  • Treaty Landscape Overview
    A systematic inventory of the 18 Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BITs“) currently in force between BRICS member states, with analysis of their evolution, coverage, and legal effect.
  • Comparative Treaty Practice
    Examination of substantive standards of protection (e.g., FET, expropriation, MFN, NT), dispute resolution provisions, and temporal scope, including sunset clauses.
  • Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
    Analysis of dispute resolution mechanisms available under existing treaties, including trends toward limitations on ISDS, use of state-to-state arbitration, and recent case outcomes.
  • Policy Trends and Treaty Reform
    Review of shifting national approaches—particularly Brazil, India, and South Africa—toward more restrictive investment treaty models aligned with public policy priorities.
  • Prospects for Harmonisation
    Discussion of potential pathways for intra-BRICS cooperation on investment protection, including model treaties, framework agreements, and approximation of domestic regulations.

This essential resource equips legal and policy professionals with practical guidance on structuring investments and offers researchers clear insights into the evolving BRICS investment landscape.

Related Posts

The AI Advantage: Transforming International Arbitration

The AI Advantage: Transforming International Arbitration

by Jus Mundi
29 October 2025

At the 2025 Paris seminar, Jus Mundi and Charles Russell Speechlys discussed AI’s impact on international arbitration, ethics, and the...

The Fine Line Between Efficiency and Ethics: Lessons from  the CBAr Jovem Event

The Fine Line Between Efficiency and Ethics: Lessons from  the CBAr Jovem Event

by Jus Connect
27 October 2025

At CBAr Jovem 2025, young practitioners debated reform, ethics, and integrity—reminding that in arbitration, efficiency and ethics must coexist.

AI and Exceeding Power: Lessons from LaPaglia v. Valve Corporation

AI and Exceeding Power: Lessons from LaPaglia v. Valve Corporation

by Jus Mundi
24 October 2025

Can AI draft an arbitral award? LaPaglia v. Valve forces courts to decide where assistance ends and delegation begins in...

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Reports
  • Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© 2023 Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Partnerships
    • Conference Reports
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Arbitration Aftermath
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Clyde & Co
      • London VYAP
      • SG VYAP
  • World
    • Africa
    • Americas
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
      • Latin America
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Jus Events
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect