Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsIn MSA Global, the Delhi High Court treats an arbitrator's non-disclosure as a standalone public policy ground, diverging from the...
Part 3 of Middle East Arbitration: Six Dubai decisions reveal how UAE courts approach foreign award enforcement, annulment grounds, non-signatories,...
What happens when a state cannot identify the proper forum? The Antrix–Devas saga raises questions of denial of justice, FET,...
Singapore Academy of Law and Jus Mundi sign an MOU to expand global access to Singapore arbitration scholarship and legal...
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetailsThis article, written by one of its co-founders, recounts the creation story of ArbitralWomen, showcasing the challenges faced and the...
This week, Ben Sanderson is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Practitioner of the Week. Find out more
A CAM study (2020–2023) explores dissenting opinions in arbitration, highlighting their limited use and prevalence in high-value international disputes.
Exploring investor-state mediation, global experts discuss its potential, benefits, and limitations in dispute resolution during a webinar hosted by SG...
The Supreme Court's decision in Kabab-Ji v Kout Food Group reinforces England's pro-arbitration stance, clarifying governing law validity, and endorsing...
© Jus Mundi