Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsHow the Indian Supreme Court's Velusamy ruling impacts the New York Convention, creating new cross-border enforcement hurdles for late arbitral...
In 2025, landmark UAE court rulings strengthened its pro-arbitration framework, clarifying anti-suit injunctions, award signatures, and DIFC/ADGM interim relief.
Cambridge University Press joins Jus Mundi with 27 authoritative titles, from Schreuer's ICSID Commentary to the AJIL, now searchable through...
As the EU AI Act takes shape, leading arbitral institutions call for clearer rules on who should bear AI obligations...
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetailsExplore Poland’s latest arbitration reforms, key Supreme Court rulings, and rule updates from major arbitration courts, enhancing efficiency and accessibility...
AI agents, from basic reflex systems to advanced learning models, are integral to daily life, aiding in management and navigation....
Covid 19 disruptions, Russia-Ukraine repercussions, emergent issues, and subsequent disruptions in the construction and engineering sectors have intensified arbitration proceedings....
Explore how the GreenX Metals v Poland case shapes mining investment protection, highlighting key BIT implications and regulatory challenges in...
On 2 September 2021, the CJEU rendered its latest – but probably not its last – decision on the salient...
© Jus Mundi