Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsExplore how the 2026 ICC Rules make Terms of Reference optional, shifting their functions to PO-1 and the CMC, and...
In MSA Global, the Delhi High Court treats an arbitrator's non-disclosure as a standalone public policy ground, diverging from the...
Part 3 of Middle East Arbitration: Six Dubai decisions reveal how UAE courts approach foreign award enforcement, annulment grounds, non-signatories,...
What happens when a state cannot identify the proper forum? The Antrix–Devas saga raises questions of denial of justice, FET,...
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetails
Jus Mundi interviewed the renowned arbitrator in the arbitration world, Bernard Hanotiau, Partner at Hanotiau & van den Berg.
This article discusses section 69 of England's Arbitration Act as a party who has just lost an arbitration where a...
Unveiling a dynamic alliance, Jus Mundi partners with ABA ILS & DRS to amplify global arbitration awareness, providing easy access...
Jus Mundi, the global legal AI leader, expands in APAC with a new Singapore office, enhancing legal access and partnerships...
A French ruling underscores: parties must raise independence concerns directly with arbitrators—not just the institution—to preserve annulment rights.
Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.
Follow Us
