Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsCan climate regulation become indirect expropriation? Part II explores how the ICJ’s Climate Opinion may reshape the balance in investment...
Part 2 of Middle East Arbitration: 50 Moments That Shaped 2025 focuses on Dubai rulings concerning agreement validity, award scope,...
Explore how the 2026 ICC Rules affect construction arbitration: TOR abolition, HEAP, expedited tracks, emergency relief, and multi-party disputes.
In Xerxes v CEC, the Nigerian Court of Appeal reaffirms award finality, the territorial principle, and the limits of enforcement...
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetailsDiscover the most transparent arbitration teams & practitioners in 2022-2023 in Jus Connect's 2023 data-backed Rankings.
Japan's recent amendments to its Arbitration Act mark a significant stride in bolstering its stature as an international arbitration hub....
Exploring Public Policy in Arbitration: Insights from the World Arbitration Update 2024 on global trends in setting aside and enforcement...
The article reviews Brazil's "Anti-Arbitration Law Project," raising concerns about how it might affect key aspects of arbitration, such as...
Can parties switch arbitral rules after emergency arbitration but before filing a claim? This piece explores the legal twilight zone...
© Jus Mundi