Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreNon-party documents in England & Wales-seated arbitration: when can courts help? VXJ v FY clarifies the strict limits of the...
The 2026 KCAB Arbitration Rules mark a decade reform, introducing award scrutiny, early determination, fast-track procedures, and funding disclosure.
Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Week 2025: why post‑M&A disputes are rising, and how valuation experts and SCC Express can...
From agentic AI to deepfakes: expert insights on how AI is reshaping arbitration practice and what practitioners need to know...
The Promise and Imperative of Specialized AI in Arbitration Generic AI wasn't built for arbitration's complexity. Cross-border disputes demand reasoning that understands jurisdictional nuance, procedural differences, and strategic implications. Most tools deliver surface-level responses when million-dollar cases require depth. The solution isn't better generic AI. It's arbitration-specific AI. This exclusive research from Stanford CodeX and Jus Mundi reveals why domain-specific...
Read moreExplore the influence of AI on arbitration: unveiling various tools and the necessity for legal adaptation. Discover challenges like data...
Recently the Delhi High Court set aside an ICC award in a commercial arbitration against Antrix on the basis that...
Jus Mundi 2020 White Paper on Exponential Growth in Arbitration Caseloads
A cautionary parallel to the economic term, The Tragedy of the Commons, emerges as parties' dilatory tactics challenge the system's...
This week, Horace Yuk-Lun Wong is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Practitioner of the Week. Find out more.
© 2023 Jus Mundi