Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreParis Court of Appeal reaffirms substance over form, validating ICC arbitration based on parties’ common intention under Article 1507 FCCP.
A Paris Baby Arbitration panel examined guerrilla tactics in international arbitration from arbitrator, counsel, and institutional perspectives.
Wordstone saves 3 hours per lawyer per day with Jus AI, accelerating arbitration research from weeks to minutes and competing...
Non-party documents in England & Wales-seated arbitration: when can courts help? VXJ v FY clarifies the strict limits of the...
The Promise and Imperative of Specialized AI in Arbitration Generic AI wasn't built for arbitration's complexity. Cross-border disputes demand reasoning that understands jurisdictional nuance, procedural differences, and strategic implications. Most tools deliver surface-level responses when million-dollar cases require depth. The solution isn't better generic AI. It's arbitration-specific AI. This exclusive research from Stanford CodeX and Jus Mundi reveals why domain-specific...
Read moreThis week, Ina Popova is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Practitioner of the Week. Find out more
This week, Alexandra Johnson is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Practitioner of the Week. Find out more
Exploring changes in arbitration laws in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Tanzania, this piece reflects Africa's modernization efforts to attract investment. It...
Explore the evolution of Third-Party Funding (TPF) in China, highlighting its rise, legal challenges, and strategic benefits in litigation and...
This week, Alexander Yanos is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Practitioner of the Week. Find out more.
© 2023 Jus Mundi