Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsParis Court of Appeal rejects document production request in ICC award annulment, affirming strict evidentiary standards for procedural fraud in...
As Africa modernises its arbitration frameworks, institutional growth and mining reforms are redefining the continent's dispute resolution landscape.
Beyond hallucinations: prompt injection is exposing a new generation of AI risks for lawyers, courts and international arbitration.
Can courts enforce security while arbitration is pending? A landmark English ruling reshapes the balance between litigation and arbitration.
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetailsOne of the most significant and controversial proposals in the Law Commission’s first Consultation Paper on the English Arbitration Act...
Paris Court of Appeal confirms ICC tribunal’s decision in Consorzio v. Venezuela, stressing waiver and consistency in jurisdictional challenges.
Find out the most active expert firms in construction arbitration in 2022-2023, according to Jus Connect & Jus Mundi's databases.
India’s Supreme Court applies transnational issue estoppel to prevent award debtors from relitigating merits at the enforcement stage.
The newly launched Cross-Institutional Rules of Arbitration by TIAC and HKIAC introduce a unique decision-making mechanism for administered arbitration, aiming...
© Jus Mundi