Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsWhat happens when a state cannot identify the proper forum? The Antrix–Devas saga raises questions of denial of justice, FET,...
Singapore Academy of Law and Jus Mundi sign an MOU to expand global access to Singapore arbitration scholarship and legal...
Part 2 of Xerxes v CEC explores how Nigeria treats recognised foreign awards as debts and reinforces the seat’s exclusive...
Can climate regulation become indirect expropriation? Part II explores how the ICJ’s Climate Opinion may reshape the balance in investment...
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetailsGermany proposes arbitration reforms to modernize its legal framework, enhance digitalization, and improve efficiency. Key changes include English-language proceedings, award...
Arbitration Aftermath: Gas, LNG & metals disputes in Sweden, UK & Singapore—Svea Court annuls Gazprom award, Taleveras wins vs NLNG,...
Brazil's construction arbitration landscape is growing, driven by a thriving civil construction industry, with disputes, especially related to economic-financial rebalancing,...
The proposed International Commercial Arbitration Bill (2023) aligns Israel with the UNCITRAL Model Law, improving arbitration frameworks and urgent interim...
This article delves into key issues in the Latin American energy sector, exploring potential disputes arising from political changes, regulatory...
© Jus Mundi