Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreGayatri Balasamy dissent warns against judicial overreach in arbitration, affirming that award modification undermines party autonomy and international enforceability.
Singapore courts balance party autonomy and creditor protection, refining how arbitration and cross-border insolvency coexist in evolving jurisprudence.
Iran restricts foreign law in courts but allows it in arbitration; parties must prove its content, as judges and arbitrators...
Russia's top court curtails international arbitration for sanctioned entities, reinforcing national jurisdiction and challenging cross-border contract enforcement.
Discover how leadership perceptions vs. real values shape global B2B success—Part 6 reveals the power of empathy, trust & inclusion in cross-cultural business.
Read moreThis is the second part of a series that discusses the implications of the Russian invasion of Ukraine under international...
Jus Mundi has made an exclusive partnership with the Center for Arbitration and Conciliation of the Bogotá Chamber of Commerce...
Jus Mundi has released its inaugural Mission Report, marking a key milestone in its commitment as a Société à Mission...
The Campaign for Greener Arbitrations (the Campaign) – a global movement advocating for environmentally sustainable practices in international arbitral proceedings...
Brazil’s Superior Court supports party autonomy in arbitration, ruling that parties' agreed procedures prevail over Civil Procedure Code in ICC...
© 2023 Jus Mundi