Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreBusiness development in arbitration: Lawyering Plus S2:E2 delivers practical guidance on pitching and client strategy from Charlie Caher.
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Paris Court of Appeal reaffirms substance over form, validating ICC arbitration based on parties’ common intention under Article 1507 FCCP.
A Paris Baby Arbitration panel examined guerrilla tactics in international arbitration from arbitrator, counsel, and institutional perspectives.
The Promise and Imperative of Specialized AI in Arbitration Generic AI wasn't built for arbitration's complexity. Cross-border disputes demand reasoning that understands jurisdictional nuance, procedural differences, and strategic implications. Most tools deliver surface-level responses when million-dollar cases require depth. The solution isn't better generic AI. It's arbitration-specific AI. This exclusive research from Stanford CodeX and Jus Mundi reveals why domain-specific...
Read moreThis week, Isabel Kunsman is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Practitioner of the Week. Find out more.
The International Centre for Dispute Resolution® (ICDR®), the international division of the American Arbitration Association® (AAA®), and Jus Mundi has...
This week, Eva Kalnina is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Practitioner of the Week. Find out more
Join us for an intriguing interview with Affef Ben Mansour.
Conflicting Turkish court decisions on enforcing foreign arbitral awards spotlight uncertainty over finality certificates and alignment with the New York...
© 2023 Jus Mundi