Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreProfessor Andrea Bjorklund’s seminar examines strategy and advocacy in investment treaty arbitration, drawing on Methanex and current debates on ISDS...
Resource nationalism and military rule are transforming investment conditions in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger. A guide to investor protections.
When can Singapore courts step in during arbitration? This decision reinforces Article 5 of the UNCITRAL Model Law and limits...
Singapore International Commercial Court upholds arbitral award in USD 14.7M dispute, rejecting natural justice challenge to valuation methodology.
The Promise and Imperative of Specialized AI in Arbitration Generic AI wasn't built for arbitration's complexity. Cross-border disputes demand reasoning that understands jurisdictional nuance, procedural differences, and strategic implications. Most tools deliver surface-level responses when million-dollar cases require depth. The solution isn't better generic AI. It's arbitration-specific AI. This exclusive research from Stanford CodeX and Jus Mundi reveals why domain-specific...
Read moreThis month, Accuracy is nominated as Jus Connect Arbitration Team of the Month. Find out more!
Find out the most active expert firms in construction arbitration in 2022-2023, according to Jus Connect & Jus Mundi's databases.
In a groundbreaking ruling, England's High Court annulled an $11 billion arbitral award against Nigeria, citing fraud and breaches of...
This article takes a look at the ICSID, UNCITRAL & EU regulation propositions.
Jus Connect releases the 2023 edition of its data-backed arbitration rankings. Learn more!
© 2023 Jus Mundi