Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsAs the EU AI Act takes shape, leading arbitral institutions call for clearer rules on who should bear AI obligations...
Paris Court of Appeal rejects document production request in ICC award annulment, affirming strict evidentiary standards for procedural fraud in...
As Africa modernises its arbitration frameworks, institutional growth and mining reforms are redefining the continent's dispute resolution landscape.
Beyond hallucinations: prompt injection is exposing a new generation of AI risks for lawyers, courts and international arbitration.
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetailsThe Supreme Court's decision in Kabab-Ji v Kout Food Group reinforces England's pro-arbitration stance, clarifying governing law validity, and endorsing...
On 2 September 2021, the CJEU rendered its latest – but probably not its last – decision on the salient...
Multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses offer a path to de-escalation and compromise, yet recent cases, notably Kajima Construction Europe (UK) Ltd...
Exploring Egypt's evolving stance on enforcing international arbitral awards, this article highlights recent Cairo Court decisions on procedural complexities and...
Amidst this week's news: CJUE Advocate General asserts UK Supreme Court breached EU law by enforcing ICSID award, Russia faces...
© Jus Mundi