Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreThe 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Paris Court of Appeal reaffirms substance over form, validating ICC arbitration based on parties’ common intention under Article 1507 FCCP.
A Paris Baby Arbitration panel examined guerrilla tactics in international arbitration from arbitrator, counsel, and institutional perspectives.
Wordstone saves 3 hours per lawyer per day with Jus AI, accelerating arbitration research from weeks to minutes and competing...
The Promise and Imperative of Specialized AI in Arbitration Generic AI wasn't built for arbitration's complexity. Cross-border disputes demand reasoning that understands jurisdictional nuance, procedural differences, and strategic implications. Most tools deliver surface-level responses when million-dollar cases require depth. The solution isn't better generic AI. It's arbitration-specific AI. This exclusive research from Stanford CodeX and Jus Mundi reveals why domain-specific...
Read more
Jus Mundi partners with CIAM to share non-confidential arbitration awards globally, promoting access to maritime and financial dispute resolution insights.
With Jus Mundi, Charles Russell Speechlys transformed arbitration work, achieving 50% faster research, 80% quicker arbitrator checks, and stronger confidence...
A deep dive into global challenges of third-party funding in international arbitration and how these developments intersect with Ukraine’s evolving...
Can AI revolutionize arbitration without replacing lawyers? Insights from Stockholm reveal how technology and human judgment can coexist responsibly.
This article discusses London vs Singapore that are neck and neck in the pursuit of the title of the world’s...
Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.
Follow Us
