Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR)
Contribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsContribute to JMAR, Jus Mundi’s international arbitration journal. Share expert insights and reach a global audience of legal scholars and practitioners.
Read moreDetailsRecent jurisprudence and the stalled 2024 Arbitration Bill underscore why precise seat drafting is the defining factor for enforcing foreign...
Following Home Care Retail Marts, unsuccessful parties in Indian arbitrations can now leverage Section 9 post-award, creating new hurdles for...
Why do States sometimes fight losing battles rather than settle? Explore the political and institutional forces behind Investor-State settlement paralysis.
French Cour de cassation sets aside an arbitral award judgment, ruling that diplomatic notes exclude dual nationals from BITs under...
The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.
Read moreDetailsSingapore Court of Appeal in Gonzalo Gil White v. Oro Negro clarifies limits of anti-suit injunctions, reinforcing contractual covenants and...
The Court confirms that jurisdiction ratione temporis must be assessed solely by reference to the treaty’s arbitration offer, not broader...
The Shanghai International Arbitration Center (SHIAC) and Jus Mundi have formed a unique partnership to make non-confidential SHIAC arbitration information...
UNCITRAL adopts SPEDR model clauses, revolutionizing tech dispute resolution with expedited arbitration, expert advisors, and confidentiality provisions for high-tech industries.
Jus Connect’s 2025 rankings highlight the top 10 most active law firms in commercial arbitration in China—data-driven and merit-based.
© Jus Mundi