Damages in Arbitration Series – A Perspective from Germany
Explore how damages are assessed under German law in arbitration—from full compensation principles to key distinctions in M&A and contract...
Explore how damages are assessed under German law in arbitration—from full compensation principles to key distinctions in M&A and contract...
Can defamation claims be effectively resolved through arbitration? Explore key insights on jurisdiction, relief, and confidentiality in arbitral defamation cases.
India’s evolving arbitration regime sparks debate: is judicial review a safeguard or overreach? This article analyzes key caselaw and proposed...
How are damages assessed in France-seated arbitrations? This article explores the legal foundations, quantification standards, and treatment of interest under...
Can parties switch arbitral rules after emergency arbitration but before filing a claim? This piece explores the legal twilight zone...
PAW 2025 panelists unpack how arbitrators and courts apply mandatory rules in arbitration, from public policy to insolvency and interim...
Explore how damages are assessed in Spanish arbitration—quantification, limits on punitive damages, and the crucial role of expert evidence.
Explore global AI disclosure guidelines in arbitration and access a practical model clause to promote transparency and procedural fairness.
Explore how Egyptian and Libyan law address damages in arbitration, from moral harm to interest prohibition, and the nuances in...
A 2023 data-driven review of global arbitration trends—case values, procedural tools, and state participation—based on top institutions’ annual reports.
Tribunal in Odyssey v. Mexico highlights key standards for assessing witness credibility in ISDS, offering guidance on testimonial evidence strategy.
Chilean tribunals increasingly consider non-pecuniary damages in contracts—shifting doctrine on moral loss in commercial arbitration.
© 2023 Jus Mundi