India

A critical analysis of the Bombay High Court’s landmark decision in Osterreichischer Lloyd Seereederei (Cyprus) Ltd. v. Victore Ships Pvt....

2025 Arbitration Year in Review: India highlights how the Supreme Court refined consent, confidentiality, enforcement, and award review.

The 2025 Arbitration Year in Review is out: a global analysis of reforms, jurisprudence, and enforcement across 40+ seats.

Indian courts clarify when unsigned arbitration clauses are enforceable—and when permissive language falls short.

India’s EPIL decision puts anti-arbitration injunctions back in focus, testing the limits of comity in global arbitration.

AI adoption in arbitration is advancing unevenly across Asia and the Middle East, with hubs like Singapore, China, and the...

India’s Glencore v. Shree Ganesh Metals ruling exposes inconsistencies with the New York Convention and reignites debate over written arbitration...

India’s Supreme Court in Kamal Gupta v. L.R. Builders upholds arbitration confidentiality, barring non-signatories from observing proceedings post-2019 amendment.

MCIA and Jus Mundi partner to expand global access to Indian arbitration, promoting transparency with open access to awards and...

Exploring how courts interpret “may” in arbitration clauses—India vs global views—and why precise drafting matters to avoid disputes.

Judicial evolution in India affirms tribunal autonomy to implead non-signatories, but the Arbitration Amendment Bill 2024 leaves statutory recognition absent.

India’s Supreme Court in Gayatri sparks debate by allowing limited award modifications under Sections 34 & 37, raising arbitral autonomy...