Has the Indian Supreme Court Allowed Modifications to Awards Barred by the Arbitration Act?
India’s Supreme Court in Gayatri sparks debate by allowing limited award modifications under Sections 34 & 37, raising arbitral autonomy...
India’s Supreme Court in Gayatri sparks debate by allowing limited award modifications under Sections 34 & 37, raising arbitral autonomy...
Can smart contracts hold up in arbitration? Explore global legal perspectives and what they mean for enforceability in digital dispute...
Asian corporate arbitration trends discussed at LIDW: exit cases, jurisdictional dynamics, and the role of disputes counsel in deal structuring.
Michele Sonen joins Jus Mundi as Head of APAC – bringing regional insight, international expertise, and a clear vision for...
Singapore–Bahrain cross-border appeals model sets new precedent in judicial cooperation, blending sovereignty with international commercial court innovation.
Gayatri Balasamy dissent warns against judicial overreach in arbitration, affirming that award modification undermines party autonomy and international enforceability.
Singapore courts balance party autonomy and creditor protection, refining how arbitration and cross-border insolvency coexist in evolving jurisprudence.
ICSID clarifies investor risks in China: missteps in domestic litigation may trigger fork-in-the-road clauses, blocking arbitration on expropriation claims.
Press Release Hong Kong/Paris, 9 July 2025 Jus Mundi and eBRAM International Online Dispute Resolution Centre are pleased to expand their...
KCAB International joins Jus Mundi to expand global access to Korean arbitration resources and promote transparency through AI-powered legal technology.
This article outlines the key principles of damages under Singapore law, including compensatory remedies, penalties, and tribunal discretion—critical insights for...
Examining the clash between arbitration and insolvency in restructuring: lessons from Singapore, India, and the UK on carve-outs and creditor...
© 2023 Jus Mundi