Unsigned but Binding: Indian Jurisprudence on Consent to Arbitrate
Indian courts clarify when unsigned arbitration clauses are enforceable—and when permissive language falls short.
Indian courts clarify when unsigned arbitration clauses are enforceable—and when permissive language falls short.
India’s EPIL decision puts anti-arbitration injunctions back in focus, testing the limits of comity in global arbitration.
Duan & Duan accelerated arbitrator research by 80% and expanded its international arbitration practice using Jus AI.
SIAC’s new RIA Protocol introduces the first institutional arbitration framework tailored to restructuring and insolvency disputes, marking a major shift...
In a landmark decision, Singapore’s court rejected Russia’s immunity plea, confirming enforcement of the $50 billion Yukos awards under the...
AI adoption in arbitration is advancing unevenly across Asia and the Middle East, with hubs like Singapore, China, and the...
India’s Glencore v. Shree Ganesh Metals ruling exposes inconsistencies with the New York Convention and reignites debate over written arbitration...
Jus Mundi’s Jus AI powered a candid discussion at Singapore Convention Week with Dentons Rodyk on trust, ethics, and the...
By adopting Jus Mundi’s Jus AI, WongPartnership advances its arbitration practice, blending human insight with AI precision to redefine excellence.
From CIETAC to UNCITRAL, leaders at China Arbitration Summit 2025 explored how AI can strengthen arbitration through responsible, transparent innovation.
Singapore Court of Appeal in Voltas v York reaffirms finality in arbitration, ruling tribunals functus officio once a final award...
India’s Supreme Court in Kamal Gupta v. L.R. Builders upholds arbitration confidentiality, barring non-signatories from observing proceedings post-2019 amendment.
© Jus Mundi