Arbitration

Can AI draft an arbitral award? LaPaglia v. Valve forces courts to decide where assistance ends and delegation begins in...

From intra-EU enforcement battles to the rise of Jus AI, the 2025 TADS Alumni Homecoming offered rich reflections on arbitration’s...

Behind every smart legal AI lies smarter data. Explore how Jus AI and structured arbitration intelligence are redefining competitive advantage.

Under UNCITRAL WG III’s reform agenda, Part 2 assesses how the MIC’s state-centered design and high costs may impact investors...

Jus Mundi’s Jus AI powered a candid discussion at Singapore Convention Week with Dentons Rodyk on trust, ethics, and the...

The Brazilian Arbitration Forum 2025 at Sciences Po Paris gathered global practitioners to debate efficiency, public policy, and the profession’s...

In a landmark case, Georgia’s Supreme Court favors enforcement of an SCC award, highlighting the narrow scope of the public...

Defying recent trends under the Lugovoy Law, a Russian court enforces a South Korea arbitration clause, reaffirming party intent and...

From CIETAC to UNCITRAL, leaders at China Arbitration Summit 2025 explored how AI can strengthen arbitration through responsible, transparent innovation.

The 2024 IBA Guidelines reshape arbitration ethics—tightening conflict rules, expanding disclosure duties, and enhancing trust in global arbitration.

Paris Court rejects signature forgery claim on arbitral award, upholding authenticity presumption when arbitrator confirms authorship in Eurafrique case.

Brazilian arbitration thrives on trust and transparency—CBAr data shows minimal annulments, reaffirming arbitrators’ duty of disclosure and confidence in the...