Minimum Contacts No More? Enforcing awards in the US after CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Antrix Corp.
The US Supreme Court’s Devas ruling reshapes award enforcement by removing the “minimum contacts” hurdle under the FSIA—while leaving key...
The US Supreme Court’s Devas ruling reshapes award enforcement by removing the “minimum contacts” hurdle under the FSIA—while leaving key...
France continues to recognize foreign arbitral awards annulled at the seat, but recent case law highlights limits when such awards...
SIAC’s new RIA Protocol introduces the first institutional arbitration framework tailored to restructuring and insolvency disputes, marking a major shift...
A deep dive into global challenges of third-party funding in international arbitration and how these developments intersect with Ukraine’s evolving...
Section 6A of the Arbitration Act 2025 brings clarity to the governing law of arbitration agreements and raises fresh questions...
Recent English judgments reaffirm the strict enforcement of statutory and contractual time limits for appealing arbitral awards, underscoring the risks...
Defaulting parties pose real risks in arbitration. At ICC YAAF Berlin, practitioners shared strategies to move cases forward without compromising...
GIAC Arbitration Days spotlight emergency arbitration’s expanding role in providing urgent interim relief and advancing access to justice in Georgia.
Conflicting Turkish court decisions on enforcing foreign arbitral awards spotlight uncertainty over finality certificates and alignment with the New York...
India’s Glencore v. Shree Ganesh Metals ruling exposes inconsistencies with the New York Convention and reignites debate over written arbitration...
Can AI draft an arbitral award? LaPaglia v. Valve forces courts to decide where assistance ends and delegation begins in...
From intra-EU enforcement battles to the rise of Jus AI, the 2025 TADS Alumni Homecoming offered rich reflections on arbitration’s...
© Jus Mundi