From Counsel to Arbitrator: Client Choice, Equality and Responsibility in International Arbitration
Client choice drives arbitrator diversity—insights from the Nordic perspective on equality in international arbitration.
Client choice drives arbitrator diversity—insights from the Nordic perspective on equality in international arbitration.
A critical analysis of the Bombay High Court’s landmark decision in Osterreichischer Lloyd Seereederei (Cyprus) Ltd. v. Victore Ships Pvt....
Arbitration at a turning point: six trends from global data reveal a market reshaped by AI, geopolitics, and new hubs.
PAW spotlight: HAAART unveils HICA as arbitration confronts AI, sustainability, and geopolitical disruption.
Jus Mundi Arbitration Year In Review 2025: United Kingdom examines Section 67 reforms and key court decisions shaping jurisdictional challenges.
Arbitrating aviation disputes, from enforcement and confidentiality to interim relief, disclosure, and the strategic choices that shape effective dispute resolution.
2025 Arbitration Year in Review: China examines the new Arbitration Law and key judicial and institutional developments shaping arbitration practice.
The UAE arbitral landscape in 2025: DIAC reforms, DIFC Courts modernization, key judicial themes, and the imperative to invoke arbitration...
2025 Arbitration Year in Review: India highlights how the Supreme Court refined consent, confidentiality, enforcement, and award review.
Texas Arbitration Year in Review 2025: Navigating the Business Court’s expanded jurisdiction and the latest Supreme Court rules on delegation.
Can parties choose both arbitration and courts? Turkish decisions confirm: only a clear intention to arbitrate will hold.
NFTs and contract law: Understanding offer, acceptance, and enforceability in digital asset transactions on the blockchain.
© Jus Mundi