Damages in Arbitration Series – A Perspective from Spain
Explore how damages are assessed in Spanish arbitration—quantification, limits on punitive damages, and the crucial role of expert evidence.
Explore how damages are assessed in Spanish arbitration—quantification, limits on punitive damages, and the crucial role of expert evidence.
ACICA and Jus Mundi partner to expand global access to arbitration resources and promote Australian expertise in international dispute resolution.
Can arbitration bar suits against affiliates? Renaissance v. ILLC tests anti-suit injunctions, affiliate claims, and arbitral integrity under English law.
Does a partial jurisdictional challenge void an entire arbitration in Indonesia? This case analysis explores tribunal authority, arbitrability, and legal...
AAA-ICDR and Jus Mundi have launched the AAA-ICDR Dispute Resolution Library with full AI integration, providing free access to the...
DIAC partners with Jus Mundi to boost arbitration with AI tools, legal transparency, and education through a bold innovation and...
Will ECJ rulings reshape sports arbitration? A deep dive into CAS reforms, legal tensions, and the Nordics' potential role in...
Explore how Egyptian and Libyan law address damages in arbitration, from moral harm to interest prohibition, and the nuances in...
A 2023 data-driven review of global arbitration trends—case values, procedural tools, and state participation—based on top institutions’ annual reports.
Tribunal in Odyssey v. Mexico highlights key standards for assessing witness credibility in ISDS, offering guidance on testimonial evidence strategy.
Chilean tribunals increasingly consider non-pecuniary damages in contracts—shifting doctrine on moral loss in commercial arbitration.
Arbitration Aftermath: Key rulings from Canada, France & the US highlight enforcement trends and challenges in post-award investor-state disputes.
© 2023 Jus Mundi