The Advocate’s Dilemma: When Confidence Becomes Overconfidence
At PAW, ICC panel explores how myside bias and overconfidence affect arbitration advocacy, strategy and client decision-making.
At PAW, ICC panel explores how myside bias and overconfidence affect arbitration advocacy, strategy and client decision-making.
Wintershall Dea II highlights a jurisdictional clash between DIFC courts and Russia’s Arbitrazh courts over anti-suit orders, sanctions, and enforcement.
The India-EU FTA marks a trade milestone, but its unfinished investment protection framework leaves key questions on investor certainty and...
Paris Arbitration Week: DLA Piper’s panel explored French annulment proceedings, recent case law, best practices, and reform prospects.
AI-driven data centre disputes in the Middle East raise complex issues of force majeure, regulation, and investor protection.
Client choice drives arbitrator diversity—insights from the Nordic perspective on equality in international arbitration.
A critical analysis of the Bombay High Court’s landmark decision in Osterreichischer Lloyd Seereederei (Cyprus) Ltd. v. Victore Ships Pvt....
Arbitration Year in Review 2025 : How are English arbitrations adapting to crypto disputes? A look at digital asset regulation,...
Arbitration at a turning point: six trends from global data reveal a market reshaped by AI, geopolitics, and new hubs.
PAW spotlight: HAAART unveils HICA as arbitration confronts AI, sustainability, and geopolitical disruption.
Lawyering Plus explores networking as a core legal skill, focusing on authenticity, trust, and long-term professional growth.
Jus Mundi Arbitration Year In Review 2025: United Kingdom examines Section 67 reforms and key court decisions shaping jurisdictional challenges.
© Jus Mundi