No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus

by Jus Mundi

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus by Jus Mundi
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Jus Mundi Announces Private Beta for AI-Powered Arbitrator Search, Built on Ethical AI Principles

27 October 2026
in Legal Tech & AI, News, Products
Jus Mundi Announces Private Beta for AI-Powered Arbitrator Search, Built on Ethical AI Principles

Jus AI will be the first agentic AI to help counsel, parties and institutions identify and assess candidates. 


Press Release

Paris, October 27, 2026


Jus Mundi today announced a private beta for new arbitrator search capabilities in Jus AI, its agentic AI platform for international arbitration.

Building on Jus Connect’s thousands of data-backed profiles of arbitration professionals and its Conflict Checker tool, Jus Mundi is extending Jus AI beyond legal research, analysis and drafting to support another crucial part of arbitration proceedings: identifying and assessing potential arbitrator candidates.

The new capabilities are designed to help practitioners move from the facts, issues and strategy of a case to an evidence-supported shortlist, followed by deeper due diligence, including conflict checks, on individual candidates. They are not intended to automate appointments or replace formal conflict checks, verification or disclosure obligations.

“Arbitrator selection is one of the most consequential, and least supported, decisions in any arbitration. Practitioners have long relied on reputation, personal networks and informal exchanges with colleagues to identify potential candidates. Our clients asked us to help make this process more transparent and evidence-based, and we listened. This beta is the first step toward giving practitioners broader visibility and more robust evidence through AI-powered arbitrator search, built on ethical AI principles,” said Jean-Rémi de Maistre, CEO and Co-Founder of Jus Mundi.

A New Standard for Arbitrator Selection

Powered by Jus AI Tenet v5, its proprietary LLM model made for arbitration, Jus AI combines an agentic architecture with lawyer-led quality assurance and an AI management system certified to ISO/IEC 42001 for the responsible development and use of AI.

Choosing an arbitrator is one of the most consequential decisions in a case, yet it often rests on personal networks, word of mouth and hours of manual research. Jus AI aims to change that in three ways:

  • Better-informed choices. Lawyers can ground a shortlist of arbitrator candidates in documented experience, published reasoning and the specific issues of their case, not reputation alone.
  • A wider, more diverse pool. By surfacing relevant candidates beyond the most familiar names, AI can help practitioners identify qualified professionals, including newer or under-represented candidates, who might otherwise receive less visibility.
  • Time back for strategy. Faster shortlisting and earlier due diligence free up time for judgment and client advice, and help spot potential issues before an appointment is made rather than after.

For parties and institutions, this means more transparent nominations and stronger confidence in the people deciding their disputes. For the arbitration community, it is a step toward a fairer, more open appointment process.

Why a Private Beta

AI can broaden access to information about practitioners and help lawyers look beyond familiar names. But it can also reinforce existing appointment patterns, overlook less-documented experience or produce incomplete or inaccurate impressions of a person’s work.

As a mission-driven company, Jus Mundi believes these questions should be addressed with the broader global arbitration community, not only within a product team. Jus Mundi intends to invite members of its Mission Committee, a limited group of engaged clients and partners, and organizations with expertise in diversity and professional standards, such as Equal Representation in Arbitration Pledge and Arbitral Women, to help test and challenge the approach.

The program will run for approximately three months, with access opened progressively. Broader release will follow the review and implementation of the feedback received.

Shaping the Standard with the Arbitration Community

Participants will assess the relevance of candidates suggested by Jus AI, the clarity of the supporting evidence, the treatment of different forms of experience, and the risks of bias or misrepresentation.

Jus Mundi’s goal is not to automate arbitrator appointments or replace professional judgment. It is to give practitioners broader visibility, stronger evidence and a more efficient starting point for one of the most consequential decisions in an arbitration.

The private beta reflects Jus Mundi’s belief that responsible AI should be developed with the communities it serves. Feedback from program participants will help shape both the product and the safeguards around it.

About Jus Mundi

Jus Mundi is the AI-powered global arbitration intelligence platform. Built by international arbitration practitioners, the company architected its intelligence platform specifically for arbitration’s unique demands. Leveraging partnerships with over 100 arbitral institutions, publishers, and associations worldwide, Jus Mundi serves over 700 leading arbitration teams through three integrated experiences: Jus Mundi for multilingual research, Jus Connect for professional selection, and Jus AI for agentic reasoning. With offices in Paris, New York, London, Singapore & Mexico City, Jus Mundi is committed to powering global justice by democratizing access to legal and arbitration intelligence globally.


Jus Mundi

Jus Mundi

AI-Powered Global Legal Intelligence

*The views and opinions expressed by authors are theirs and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations, employers, or Daily Jus, Jus Mundi, or Jus Connect. This article is intended merely to highlight issues and not to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. Readers should conduct independent research and analysis before acting and consult, as needed, qualified legal counsel.

Related Posts

Looking Back, Moving Forward: What’s Next for Morocco VYAP?

Looking Back, Moving Forward: What’s Next for Morocco VYAP?

byYassine Alaouiand1 others
27 October 2026

Morocco VYAP reflects on a year of partnerships, regional events, and mentorship initiatives shaping the next generation of arbitration practitioners.

CORD Rules of Arbitration 2026: New Rules Governing AI, Procedural Delay, and Appeals

CORD Rules of Arbitration 2026: New Rules Governing AI, Procedural Delay, and Appeals

byDeepika Kinhal
23 October 2026

CORD’s new arbitration rules combine AI accountability, financial consequences for delay, tiered fees, and optional review of awards.

Deep Mode: The Engineering Behind Arbitration’s Most Rigorous AI Mode

Introducing Jus AI 3: Faster, Sharper and Better-Grounded Legal Research

byJus Mundi
14 October 2026

Jus AI 3 delivers 19% faster time to first answer and better-grounded legal research for international arbitration, with stronger sources...

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Conference Reports
    • Partnerships
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Sports
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Charles Russell Speechlys
      • Ciarb UAE
      • Clyde & Co
      • Harvard International Arbitration Law Students Association (HIALSA)
      • Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
      • London VYAP
      • Paris Baby Arbitration (PBA)
      • SG VYAP
      • Sciences Po TADS
      • Sygna Partners
      • Lawyering Plus
      • Linklaters
  • World
    • Africa
      • Egypt
      • Nigeria
    • Americas
      • Latin America
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Australia
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
      • Russia
      • Sweden
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Qatar
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Industry
    • Construction
    • Energy
      • Electric Power
      • Oil & Gas
    • Mining
    • Telecommunication
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • The Daily Jus Editorial Team
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect