No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus

by Jus Mundi

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus by Jus Mundi
No Result
View All Result
Home Legal Insights Arbitration

The International Court of Justice and the Parties: A Statistical Overview by Edgardo Sobenes

30 April 2020
in Arbitration, Legal Insights
The International Court of Justice and the Parties: A Statistical Overview by Edgardo Sobenes

About the paper

In commemoration of the 74th anniversary of the International Court of Justice, the author provides a statistical overview of the contentious cases that have been brought before the Court, and of the parties involved in those proceedings. In a three-step analysis, and with the support of tables and graphics, the author identifies which countries have appeared the most before the ICJ, and reflects on how further data-driven analysis can contribute to a better understanding of inter-state litigation and the actors involved.

Error! This download item is not available! It may be unpublished, private, or you may not have permission to view it.

 

About the author

Edgardo Sobenes is an international lawyer with more than 10 years of experience in the field of Public International Law, settlement of international disputes, and diplomacy. His litigation practice includes the representation of sovereign states before the International Court of Justice and unique practice in coordinating and managing international legal teams. He holds an Advanced LL.M in Public International Law and International Dispute Settlement from Leiden University, an International Master’s in Law from the University of Barcelona and ISDE, and a degree in Law and Economics from the Central American University (UCA). For more information visit his webpage: www.edgardosobenes.com

Jus Mundi

Jus Mundi

AI-Powered Global Legal Intelligence

*The views and opinions expressed by authors are theirs and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations, employers, or Daily Jus, Jus Mundi, or Jus Connect. This article is intended merely to highlight issues and not to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. Readers should conduct independent research and analysis before acting and consult, as needed, qualified legal counsel.

Related Posts

CORD Rules of Arbitration 2026: New Rules Governing AI, Procedural Delay, and Appeals

CORD Rules of Arbitration 2026: New Rules Governing AI, Procedural Delay, and Appeals

byDeepika Kinhal
23 October 2026

CORD’s new arbitration rules combine AI accountability, financial consequences for delay, tiered fees, and optional review of awards.

State Immunity and the New York Convention: English and Australian Perspectives

State Immunity and the New York Convention: English and Australian Perspectives

byImogen Kenny-Bartlettand1 others
22 October 2026

English and Australian courts confirm that ratifying the New York Convention does not by itself waive state immunity from award...

Defence Disputes in Arbitration

Defence Disputes in Arbitration

byOleg Shaulko
21 October 2026

Defence disputes are emerging as a new arbitration practice area, shaped by sanctions, export controls, classified evidence, and complex international...

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Conference Reports
    • Partnerships
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Sports
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Charles Russell Speechlys
      • Ciarb UAE
      • Clyde & Co
      • Harvard International Arbitration Law Students Association (HIALSA)
      • Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
      • London VYAP
      • Paris Baby Arbitration (PBA)
      • SG VYAP
      • Sciences Po TADS
      • Sygna Partners
      • Lawyering Plus
      • Linklaters
  • World
    • Africa
      • Egypt
      • Nigeria
    • Americas
      • Latin America
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Australia
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
      • Russia
      • Sweden
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Qatar
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Industry
    • Construction
    • Energy
      • Electric Power
      • Oil & Gas
    • Mining
    • Telecommunication
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • The Daily Jus Editorial Team
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect