No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus

by Jus Mundi

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus by Jus Mundi
No Result
View All Result

Home Industry Mining

Mining Arbitration Report 2023: Most Active Expert Firms

21 July 2023
in Awards, Industry, Jus Connect Rankings, Mining
Mining Arbitration Report 2023: Most Selected Arbitration Institutions

This ranking was featured in our 2023 Mining Arbitration Report, which is part of a series of industry-focused arbitration reports edited by Jus Mundi and Jus Connect.

This issue explores the mining industry and presents a goldmine of information based on data available on Jus Mundi and Jus Connect as of February 2023. Discover updated insights into mining arbitration and exclusive statistics & rankings, as well as in-depth global and regional perspectives on mining projects, disputes, & arbitration from leading lawyers, arbitrators, experts, and in-house counsel.

Download it now

Parties and tribunals rely heavily on experts. As a result, expert firms are often solicited in mining arbitration to address the complexity of the issues at stake and assess damages. Mining projects create technical and complex disputes.

Therefore, expert evidence is paramount in providing clarification, knowledge, and technical assessment of complicated issues.

Our data shows that 226 expert firms were solicited in mining arbitration, of which 65 have only acted in mining cases in the sub-sector “Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas (oil)”, i.e., oil & gas cases.

Key Takeaways

  • The expert firms listed in this graph are the top 5 most active expert firms in mining arbitration, according to our data. Of these, only Navigant Consulting, Inc. and Behre Dolbear Group do not have a commercial mining arbitration caseload, according to our data.
  • FTI Consulting is the most active expert firm in mining arbitration, according to our all-time data, as well as the most active in commercial mining arbitration. Although it is among the top 3 most active expert firms in mining arbitration in the last 10 years, it is surpassed by Compass Lexecon whose mining caseload has been growing in the last decade.
  • KPMG and Economía Aplicada, S. C. have risen in the last decade. But the rising star in the last five years is Versant Partners, according to our data.
  • In the last 5 years, our data shows that Latin American mining cases have kept a high number of expert firms busy. For instance:
    • 2 mining cases against Mexico have involved a total number of 11 expert firms (Odyssey Marine Exploration v. Mexico, Legacy Vulcan v. Mexico);
    • 3 mining cases against Peru have involved at least 6 different expert firms (Lupaka v. Peru, Freeport-McMoRan v. Peru, Renco v. Peru & Activos Mineros);
    • 2 mining cases against Colombia have also involved at least 6 different expert firms (Red Eagle Exploration v. Colombia, Aris Mining v. Colombia).

Find more data-backed insights in our 2023 Mining Arbitration Report

Download the full Report

Related Posts

Procedural Fraud Must Be Credible: Paris Court of Appeal Rejects Disclosure Request

Procedural Fraud Must Be Credible: Paris Court of Appeal Rejects Disclosure Request

by Jus Mundi
15 July 2026

Paris Court of Appeal rejects document production request in ICC award annulment, affirming strict evidentiary standards for procedural fraud in...

Recent Arbitration Developments in Africa

Recent Arbitration Developments in Africa

by Jus Mundi
14 July 2026

As Africa modernises its arbitration frameworks, institutional growth and mining reforms are redefining the continent's dispute resolution landscape.

Refining the Framework for the Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards

Refining the Framework for the Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards

by Jus Mundi
7 July 2026

Singapore High Court ruling DLS v DTL SGHC 61 clarifies arbitral awards vs. interim orders and the 3-month deadline for...

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Partnerships
    • Conference Reports
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Arbitration Aftermath
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Clyde & Co
      • London VYAP
      • Paris Baby Arbitration (PBA)
      • SG VYAP
      • Sciences Po TADS
      • Sygna Partners
      • Lawyering Plus
  • World
    • Africa
      • Egypt
      • Nigeria
    • Americas
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
      • Latin America
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Australia
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
      • Russia
      • Sweden
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Qatar
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Industry
    • Construction
    • Energy
      • Electric Power
      • Oil & Gas
    • Mining
    • Telecommunication
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Jus Events
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect