No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus

by Jus Mundi

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus by Jus Mundi
No Result
View All Result
Home World Europe

We stand by the Rule of Law

1 March 2022
in Europe, World
We stand by the Rule of Law

THE AUTHOR: Jus Mundi


Developing a peaceful and prosperous future for all requires a strong international Rule of Law and building the international Rule of Law is everyone’s responsibility.  

This is the premise on which Jus Mundi was built and what we fight for —by facilitating access to global resources.  

We, therefore, join the worldwide plea for peace in Ukraine and unequivocally condemn the ongoing flagrant violation of one of the most fundamental principles of international law by the Russian Federation. 

International law requires States to settle international disputes by peaceful means. Not by acts of war but before courts.  

Article 1 (1) of the U.N. Charter states that a fundamental purpose of the United Nations is “the suppression of acts of aggression.”  

Article 2 (4) of the Charter defines acts of aggression as “the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State.”  

The U.N. Charter has been ratified by 193 States since 1945, including the Russian Federation.  

We cannot but protest the blatant acts of aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity for being a serious violation of international law.  

We stand for the Rule of Law. 

Jus Mundi

Jus Mundi

*The views and opinions expressed by authors are theirs and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations, employers, or Daily Jus, Jus Mundi, or Jus Connect. This article is intended merely to highlight issues and not to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. Readers should conduct independent research and analysis before acting and consult, as needed, qualified legal counsel.

Related Posts

Belgian Court Confirms Arbitrability of Franchise Agreement Despite the Franchisee’s Protective Regime under Belgian Law

Belgian Court Confirms Arbitrability of Franchise Agreement Despite the Franchisee’s Protective Regime under Belgian Law

byGuillaume Croisantand1 others
5 October 2026

A Belgian court confirms that a franchise dispute remains arbitrable despite statutory protections, favouring party autonomy in cross-border commercial disputes.

The Middle East Arbitration Compendium – Dubai: Jurisdiction, Procedure & Institutional Developments

The Middle East Arbitration Compendium – Qatar: Institutions, Courts & Legislative Proposals

byJoseph Chedrawe KC
2 October 2026

50 Defining Moments of 2025, Part 6: Qatar’s arbitration year in review, from QICDRC judgments and QICCA Rules to court...

Scrutinising the Scrutiny: Arbitration’s Perception in Public Discourse

Scrutinising the Scrutiny: Arbitration’s Perception in Public Discourse

byPritam Dumbré
1 October 2026

How is arbitration portrayed in public discourse? A LIDW 2026 panel examines media scrutiny, transparency, and the future of arbitration’s...

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Partnerships
    • Conference Reports
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Arbitration Aftermath
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Clyde & Co
      • London VYAP
      • Paris Baby Arbitration (PBA)
      • SG VYAP
      • Sciences Po TADS
      • Sygna Partners
      • Lawyering Plus
  • World
    • Africa
      • Egypt
      • Nigeria
    • Americas
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
      • Latin America
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Australia
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
      • Russia
      • Sweden
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Qatar
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Industry
    • Construction
    • Energy
      • Electric Power
      • Oil & Gas
    • Mining
    • Telecommunication
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Jus Events
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • The Daily Jus Editorial Team
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect