From Counsel to Arbitrator: Client Choice, Equality and Responsibility in International Arbitration
Client choice drives arbitrator diversity—insights from the Nordic perspective on equality in international arbitration.
Client choice drives arbitrator diversity—insights from the Nordic perspective on equality in international arbitration.
A critical analysis of the Bombay High Court’s landmark decision in Osterreichischer Lloyd Seereederei (Cyprus) Ltd. v. Victore Ships Pvt....
Arbitration Year in Review 2025 : How are English arbitrations adapting to crypto disputes? A look at digital asset regulation,...
Arbitration at a turning point: six trends from global data reveal a market reshaped by AI, geopolitics, and new hubs.
PAW spotlight: HAAART unveils HICA as arbitration confronts AI, sustainability, and geopolitical disruption.
Lawyering Plus explores networking as a core legal skill, focusing on authenticity, trust, and long-term professional growth.
Jus Mundi Arbitration Year In Review 2025: United Kingdom examines Section 67 reforms and key court decisions shaping jurisdictional challenges.
Paris Arbitration Week: Jus Mundi’s AI for Justice Symposium highlighted AI’s growing role in arbitration, courts, and institutional practice.
Arbitrating aviation disputes, from enforcement and confidentiality to interim relief, disclosure, and the strategic choices that shape effective dispute resolution.
BakerHostetler, with Jus Mundi, unveils a global tracker mapping intra-EU objections in arbitration and enforcement.
The Kenya-UAE BIT explained, from covered investors and investments to treaty protections, dispute resolution, and access to ICSID arbitration.
Can conciliation shape climate disputes? SG VYAP panel examines the Paris Agreement’s Draft Annex and its role in future inter-State...
© Jus Mundi