No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus

by Jus Mundi

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Jus by Jus Mundi
No Result
View All Result
Home Legal Insights Arbitration

The International Court of Justice and the Parties: A Statistical Overview by Edgardo Sobenes

30 abril 2020
in Arbitration, Legal Insights
The International Court of Justice and the Parties: A Statistical Overview by Edgardo Sobenes

About the paper

In commemoration of the 74th anniversary of the International Court of Justice, the author provides a statistical overview of the contentious cases that have been brought before the Court, and of the parties involved in those proceedings. In a three-step analysis, and with the support of tables and graphics, the author identifies which countries have appeared the most before the ICJ, and reflects on how further data-driven analysis can contribute to a better understanding of inter-state litigation and the actors involved.

Download this paper

 

About the author

Edgardo Sobenes is an international lawyer with more than 10 years of experience in the field of Public International Law, settlement of international disputes, and diplomacy. His litigation practice includes the representation of sovereign states before the International Court of Justice and unique practice in coordinating and managing international legal teams. He holds an Advanced LL.M in Public International Law and International Dispute Settlement from Leiden University, an International Master’s in Law from the University of Barcelona and ISDE, and a degree in Law and Economics from the Central American University (UCA). For more information visit his webpage: www.edgardosobenes.com

Jus Mundi

Jus Mundi

*The views and opinions expressed by authors are theirs and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations, employers, or Daily Jus, Jus Mundi, or Jus Connect. This article is intended merely to highlight issues and not to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. Readers should conduct independent research and analysis before acting and consult, as needed, qualified legal counsel.

Related Posts

The Middle East Arbitration Compendium – Dubai: Jurisdiction, Procedure & Institutional Developments

The Middle East Arbitration Compendium – Bahrain & International: Regional Treaties & Global Recognition

byJoseph Chedrawe KC
9 octubre 2026

50 Defining Moments of 2025, Part 7 explores Bahrain’s treaties, courts, arbitral institutions, and international arbitration developments.

Scrutinising the Scrutiny: Arbitration’s Perception in Public Discourse

The New Normal? A Second Annual Assessment of Turbulence in International Arbitration

byPritam Dumbré
8 octubre 2026

A LIDW 2026 panel examines how sanctions, geopolitical conflict, energy volatility, and rising costs are reshaping international arbitration.

Rewriting the Bargain: Investor Rights and the European Union Foreign Direct Investment Screening Regime at Entry

Rewriting the Bargain: Investor Rights and the European Union Foreign Direct Investment Screening Regime at Entry

byAbdullah Javed
7 octubre 2026

EU investment screening is rewriting the bargain between states and investors, with implications for FET, expropriation, and national treatment.

Load More

Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.

Follow Us

Ressources

  • News
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Legal Insights
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Publish on Daily Jus
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • About us

Newsletter

loader

Sign up now to get weekly digests of the latest arbitration updates and articles in your inbox.

© Jus Mundi

  • Home
  • About us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Jus Mundi
  • Jus Connect

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Products
    • Partnerships
    • Conference Reports
  • Jus Mundi AI Hub
  • Reports
  • Legal Insights
    • Arbitration
      • Commercial Arbitration
      • Investor-State Arbitration
      • Arbitration Aftermath
    • Mediation
    • Worldwide Perspectives
      • Arbitral Institutions’ Spotlights
      • Clyde & Co
      • London VYAP
      • Paris Baby Arbitration (PBA)
      • SG VYAP
      • Sciences Po TADS
      • Sygna Partners
      • Lawyering Plus
  • World
    • Africa
      • Egypt
      • Nigeria
    • Americas
      • U.S.A
      • Brazil
      • Latin America
    • Asia-Pacific
      • Australia
      • Central Asia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • India
      • Japan
      • Singapore
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • France
      • Germany
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • The Netherlands
      • United Kingdom
      • Russia
      • Sweden
    • Middle East & Turkey
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Qatar
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Turkey
      • UAE
  • Industry
    • Construction
    • Energy
      • Electric Power
      • Oil & Gas
    • Mining
    • Telecommunication
  • Business Development
    • Firm growth
    • Professional Development
  • Awards
    • Jus Connect Rankings
    • Arbitration Team Of the Month
    • Arbitration Practitioner Of the Week
  • In conversation with
  • Legal Tech & AI
  • Jus Events
  • Publish on Daily Jus
    • Become an Author
    • Editorial Guidelines & Process
    • Editorial Policies
  • The Daily Jusletter
  • The Daily Jus Editorial Team
  • About us

© 2024 Jus Connect