{"id":291033,"date":"2026-06-04T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/?p=291033"},"modified":"2026-06-08T15:54:55","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T13:54:55","slug":"2025-arbitration-year-in-review-chile","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/2026\/06\/04\/2025-arbitration-year-in-review-chile\/","title":{"rendered":"2025 Arbitration Year In Review &#8211; Chile"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This article was featured in <a title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/legal-intelligence\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jus Mundi<\/a>&#8216;s <strong>2025 Arbitration Year in Review<\/strong>, an annual publication analyzing arbitration developments across 40+ jurisdictions on 6 continents. This edition brings together young practitioners and senior experts to capture the year&#8217;s most significant legislative reforms, enforcement trends, and institutional innovations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-fe48e5de wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/reports\/2026\/02\/2025-arbitration-year-in-review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Download now<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>THE AUTHORS:<\/strong><br><strong>Bel\u00e9n Thomsen<\/strong>, Attorney and Partner, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/enrique-barros-compania\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Enrique Barros y Compa\u00f1\u00eda Abogados<\/a><\/strong><br><strong>Jos\u00e9 Tom\u00e1s Hirsch<\/strong>, Attorney and Associate, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/garrigues\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Garrigues<\/a><\/strong><br><strong>Mar\u00eda Luisa Petitpas<\/strong>, Economist and Vice President, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/econsult\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Econsult Capital<\/a><\/strong><br><strong>Valentina del Solar<\/strong>, Attorney and Associate, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/grupo-vial\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Grupo Vial Abogados<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:30px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The year 2025 marked a new phase for arbitration in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/d\/profile\/state\/cl\">Chile<\/a>: as international caseloads continued to rise, the country deepened its institutional integration with the Ibero-American community, courts reaffirmed a policy of minimum intervention in arbitrations, and recent investment arbitration developments tested the resilience of Chile\u2019s pro-arbitration framework. This report covers:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The integration agreement between the<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-arbitration-and-mediation-centre-of-the-santiago-chamber-of-commerce\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Arbitration and Mediation Center of the Santiago Chamber of Commerce<\/a>(\u201c<strong>CAM Santiago<\/strong>\u201d) and the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-centro-internacional-de-arbitraje-de-madrid\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">International Arbitration Center &#8211; Ibero-American Arbitration Center<\/a>\u00a0(\u201c<strong>CIAM-CIAR<\/strong>\u201d);<br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>2022\u20132025 statistics confirming the low success rate of challenges to arbitral awards; and<br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the latest developments in investment arbitrations against Chile.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>International Integration: The CAM Santiago\u2013CIAM-CIAR Alliance in 2025<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most noteworthy developments in the field of international arbitration in Chile in 2025 was the consolidation of the partnership between CAM Santiago and CIAM-CIAR.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Through this alliance, both institutions agreed to integrate their arbitral activity with the shared aim of jointly promoting the development of international arbitration and addressing its growing needs, particularly within Spanish-language and Ibero-American markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CAM Santiago is Chile\u2019s leading arbitral institution and a benchmark in Latin America. Since its establishment in 1992, it has played a pivotal role in the development and consolidation of institutional arbitrations for both domestic and international proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CIAM-CIAR is an arbitral institution that administers international proceedings with a strong focus on the Ibero-American region. It was founded in 2020 following the consolidation of the Madrid Court of Arbitration, the Spanish Court of Arbitration, the Civil and Commercial Court of Arbitration, and the Madrid Bar Association.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On April 2, 2025, during the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccs.cl\/camsantiago\/tercer-encuentro-nacional-arbitraje\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">III National Arbitration Meeting hosted by CAM Santiago in Santiago, Chile<\/a>, both institutions executed a cooperation agreement under which CAM Santiago joined CIAM-CIAR as a member institution with the same standing as its founding organizations. As part of this integration, members of CAM Santiago\u2019s executive team were incorporated into CIAM-CIAR, enabling a joint administration for international cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Specifically, CAM Santiago will refer the administration of its international arbitration cases -as defined in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bcn.cl\/leychile\/navegar?idNorma=230697\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Law No. 19.971 on International Commercial Arbitration<\/a>&#8211; to CIAM-CIAR, allowing both institutions to administer a case. This joint administration may be eased given that CAM Santiago\u2019s President, joined CIAM-CIAR\u2019s Presidency as Vice President; CAM Santiago\u2019s Legal Director, joined the institution\u2019s Plenary; and CAM Santiago\u2019s Deputy Director, joined as Deputy Secretary. To this end, CAM Santiago amended its International Arbitration Rules to include a referral clause directing cases arising from contracts executed on or after July 1, 2025, to CIAM-CIAR. Additionally, for international arbitrations arising from contracts signed prior to that date, the parties may also submit their disputes to CIAM-CIAR.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The relationship between the two institutions has now evolved from mere cooperation into genuine integration, encompassing institutional governance to the administration of international arbitration cases. This is an innovative agreement that poses a challenge for the institutions involved, as it requires the integration of distinct and geographically distant yet compatible arbitral cultures. It also creates a significant platform for the entire Ibero-American region and strengthens Spanish-language arbitration by helping to unify practices, customs, and standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ultimately, this is a mutually beneficial agreement for the institutions and for the consolidation of international arbitration in the region. The fact that Chile\u2019s principal arbitral center has joined a leading Ibero-American arbitration initiative as a member is evidence of the consolidation of arbitration in Chile, as well as a strong endorsement and recognition of CAM Santiago, which has expanded institutional arbitration beyond national borders. The challenge, however, will be ensuring that Chile continues to grow as a seat of arbitration and that administering European-seated cases does not hinder that growth or the development of its arbitrators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Minimal Intervention in Practice: How Chilean Courts Treated Challenges (2022\u20132025)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Statistics on the rate of upheld challenges to arbitral awards in Chile show a clear picture: challenges are filed but rarely succeed. Data from\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/stablobccsprod.blob.core.windows.net\/cam\/2023\/11\/Reporte-Anual-Estadistico-del-CAM-Santiago-2023nov.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2022<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/stablobccsprod.blob.core.windows.net\/cam\/2024\/05\/Reporte-Anual-Estadistico-del-CAM-Santiago-2023-vf-27-03-2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2023<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/stablobccsprod.blob.core.windows.net\/cam\/2025\/10\/Reporte-2024-Mayo.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2024<\/a>, and 2025 show that the number of complaints and challenges accepted is very low, which reinforces arbitration as a definitive solution to disputes and provides legal certainty for the parties.<br>Likewise, the case law of the Chilean superior courts has consistently upheld the principle of minimal intervention of the judiciary in arbitration, a key principle to preserve the autonomy of the arbitration system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to CAM Santiago statistics, in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/stablobccsprod.blob.core.windows.net\/cam\/2023\/11\/Reporte-Anual-Estadistico-del-CAM-Santiago-2023nov.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2022<\/a>, the courts ruled on 63 challenges against CAM awards. The most frequently used mechanism was complaints against arbitrators, of which only one was partially upheld out of 45. Overall, two-thirds of the challenges were rejected; the rest were declared inadmissible, withdrawn, archived, or received no ruling. The message was clear: judicial review operates as an exceptional safeguard, not as a second instance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The year\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/stablobccsprod.blob.core.windows.net\/cam\/2024\/05\/Reporte-Anual-Estadistico-del-CAM-Santiago-2023-vf-27-03-2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2023<\/a>\u00a0confirmed the same trend. According to CAM Santiago statistics, of the 247 awards issued that year, 41.3% were challenged. The courts ruled on 108 challenges, with 77 complaints against arbitrators processed and only six partially accepted. No cassation motions were successful and, on appeal, only one case was partially accepted.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The year\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/stablobccsprod.blob.core.windows.net\/cam\/2025\/10\/Reporte-2024-Mayo.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2024<\/a>\u00a0followed\u2014and even deepened\u2014the same trend: 142 of 211 awards were challenged (67.3%), with complaints against arbitrators predominating. Courts ruled on 104 challenges, including complaints against arbitrators, annulment petitions, appeals, and cassation requests. Of the\u00a0\u00a069 complaints against arbitrators, only three were accepted (4.3%). In addition, the Chilean courts rejected all 5 petitions to annul international awards filed that year.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Between 2024 and 2025, the courts broadened the spectrum to include complaints against arbitrators in CAM and ad hoc arbitrations, as well as those handled by other arbitration institutions. The courts heard 165 complaints, of which 12 were accepted. If we also consider that during this period, 30 additional complaints were declared inadmissible and 14 were withdrawn, the acceptance rate is approximately 5.7%. The very low rate of challenges in 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 does not suggest an absence of control, but rather calibrated control, consistent with its function: to guarantee the regularity of the process without distorting the arbitral decision. In other words, the effectiveness of the award is not a slogan; it is a measurable outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Latest Developments in Investment Arbitration<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chile\u2019s investor\u2013State docket in late 2024\u20132025 features three milestones: one award, one pending proceeding, and one case suspended for settlement negotiations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/decision\/es-interconexion-electrica-s-a-e-s-p-v-republic-of-chile-laudo-friday-13th-december-2024#decision_70862\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Interconexi\u00f3n El\u00e9ctrica S.A. E.S.P. v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB\/21\/27) \u2014 Award (December 13, 2024)<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Interconexi\u00f3n El\u00e9ctrica S.A. E.S.P. is a Colombian company that invested in Chile through Interchile S.A. and ISA Inversiones Chile SpA (jointly, \u201c<strong>ISA<\/strong>\u201d). The entities were created for the construction and commissioning of three high-voltage power transmission lines.<strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>During construction, authorities applied several delay penalties and called on the performance bonds provided by the contractor.<strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>ISA filed an ICSID claim alleging that Chile violated the obligations of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/publication\/en-fair-and-equitable-treatment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">fair and equitable treatment<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/publication\/en-full-protection-and-security-fps\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">full protection and security<\/a>\u00a0of international investments, as provided in the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/treaty\/es-free-trade-agreement-between-chile-and-colombia-chile-colombia-fta-2006-monday-27th-november-2006\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Chile\u2013Colombia Free Trade Agreement (\u201c<strong>FTA<\/strong>\u201d) (2006)<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the claimants, the social unrest of 2019 constituted an event of force majeure, contributing to delays and damages. ISA claimed US$223 million in damages.<strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>On December 13, 2024, the tribunal rendered its\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/decision\/es-interconexion-electrica-s-a-e-s-p-v-republic-of-chile-laudo-friday-13th-december-2024#decision_70862\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">award<\/a>, with a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/opinion\/en-interconexion-electrica-s-a-e-s-p-v-republic-of-chile-partial-dissent-of-luis-gonzalez-garcia-friday-13th-december-2024#opinion_3422\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">partial dissent by the arbitrator appointed by Chile<\/a>, ordering Chile to reimburse US$16 million of the delay penalty applied, plus interest, while rejecting the remainder of the US$223 million claim. Considering the outcome of the proceeding, the tribunal ordered the claimants to bear 80% of the proceeding costs.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Award was subsequently\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/decision\/es-interconexion-electrica-s-a-e-s-p-v-republic-of-chile-decision-sobre-la-rectificacion-del-laudo-tuesday-11th-march-2025\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">rectified<\/a>\u00a0by Decision of 11 March 2025, finding that there had been an arithmetic error in the amount to be reimbursed by the claimant as costs of the proceedings.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/decision\/en-adp-international-s-a-and-vinci-airports-s-a-s-v-republic-of-chile-party-representatives-thursday-1st-june-2023\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ADP International S.A. and Vinci Airports S.A.S. v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB\/21\/40) \u2014 Pending<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ADP International S.A. and Vinci Airports S.A.S., the two majority shareholders of Sociedad Concesionaria Nuevo Pudahuel S.A. (\u201c<strong>Nuevo Pudahuel<\/strong>\u201d), created in Chile for the expansion and operation of Santiago\u2019s international airport, were awarded a 20-year concession in 2015. The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/investmentpolicy.unctad.org\/investment-dispute-settlement\/cases\/1187\/adp-and-vinci-airports-v-chile\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">claimants argue<\/a>\u00a0that Chile failed to restore the concession\u2019s post-pandemic economic and financial balance by refusing to renegotiate the terms of the concession to mitigate the financial burden caused by COVID-19-related air-traffic restrictions, thereby breaching fair and equitable treatment under the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/treaty\/en-chile-france-bit-1992-chile-france-bit-1992-tuesday-14th-july-1992\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Chile\u2013France Bilateral Investment Treaty (\u201c<strong>BIT<\/strong>\u201d) (1992)<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In parallel with the ICSID proceedings, Nuevo Pudahuel (the concessionaire) initiated a domestic ad hoc arbitration against the Ministry of Public Works; in its\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/schdc.cl\/web2021\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/5.-Sentencia-Nuevo-Pudahuel-2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">decision<\/a>\u00a0of 15 May 2024, the Arbitral Commission dismissed the principal claims but partially upheld a subsidiary claim, finding that the pandemic constituted a supervening event that affected the contractual equilibrium.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/other\/es-nc-telecom-as-nc-telecom-ii-as-wom-mobile-s-a-and-wom-s-a-v-republic-of-chile-comunicado-de-prensa-del-ministerio-de-relaciones-exteriores-de-chile-sobre-la-decision-relativa-a-las-medidas-provisionales-thursday-26th-june-2025\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">NC Telecom AS, NC Telecom II AS, WOM Mobile S.A., and WOM S.A. v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB\/24\/30) \u2014 Provisional Measures Denied; Suspension for Settlement Talks (2025)<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Norwegian parent companies NC Telecom AS and NC Telecom II AS, and their Chilean subsidiaries WOM Mobile S.A. and WOM S.A., filed an ICSID claim alleging a breach of the obligation of fair and equitable treatment due to a block imposed by the Chilean government on their efforts to expand the 5G network.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Before the ICSID proceedings were initiated, the Chilean subsidiaries requested, as a provisional measure in local courts, an order preventing Chilean authorities from enforcing a series of performance bonds, arguing that the measure was urgent and necessary to avoid permanent damage, pending the constitution of the arbitral tribunal.\u00a0<br>Although the local courts\u00a0\u00a0granted WOM\u2019s request for interim relief, the ICSID tribunal rejected a similar request before it in June 2025, allowing Chile to enforce the performance bonds.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The claimants also requested, as a provisional measure,<br>In\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/other\/en-nc-telecom-as-nc-telecom-ii-as-wom-mobile-s-a-and-wom-s-a-v-republic-of-chile-press-release-of-the-chilean-sub-secretariat-of-telecommunications-subtel-on-settlement-agreement-wednesday-3rd-september-2025#other_document_47390\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">September 2025<\/a>, the parties jointly requested a suspension of the proceedings to negotiate a settlement. The agreement has not yet been officially published by ICSID. According to local press reports, the company will complete the rollout of the 5G network by a new deadline and pay approximately US$53 million to the Chilean government. The proceedings remain suspended to date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/decision\/en-bupa-investments-overseas-limited-v-republic-of-chile-party-representatives-friday-21st-november-2025\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Bupa Investments Overseas Limited v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB\/25\/50) \u2013 Request for Arbitration<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In November 2025 the British company Bupa Investments Overseas Limited (\u201cBUPA\u201d) registered a request for arbitration proceedings against Chile. Although the request was declared admissible it has not yet been published at the ICSID Database.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to local press, \u201cIsapre Cruz Blanca\u201d a health insurance company owned by BUPA, was negatively affected by several judicial and legislative measures adopted by Chile. Specifically, the company asserts that in context of Covid-19 pandemic they were forced to freeze prices, and once the pandemic was over, a law was passed that made these effects permanent and forced them to refund what they had allegedly overcharged.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These developments\u2014the CAM Santiago\u2013CIAM-CIAR integration, minimal court intervention, and an active investor\u2013State caseload\u2014suggest a more predictable and internationally connected Chilean seat, a trajectory that is expected to continue into 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Discover more insights into the latest developments in arbitration in 2025 from around the world now<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-fe48e5de wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/reports\/2026\/02\/2025-arbitration-year-in-review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Download now<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:30px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>ABOUT THE AUTHORS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.svyap.cl\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Santiago Very Young Arbitration Practitioners<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0(\u201c<strong>SVYAP<\/strong>\u201d) is a network that brings together young professionals interested in domestic and international arbitration, promoting both professional and academic engagement. SVYAP hosts academic and social events for its members, creating high-quality intergenerational spaces for networking and development.<br>The authors of this report are current members of the SVYAP Executive Committee:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Bel\u00e9n Thomsen<\/strong>, Attorney and Partner at\u00a0<strong><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/enrique-barros-compania\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Enrique Barros y Compa\u00f1\u00eda Abogados<\/a><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Jos\u00e9 Tom\u00e1s Hirsch<\/strong>, Attorney and Associate at\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/garrigues\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Garrigues<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Mar\u00eda Luisa Petitpas<\/strong>, Economist and Vice President at\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/econsult\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Econsult Capital<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Valentina del Solar<\/strong>, Attorney and Associate at\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/grupo-vial\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Grupo Vial Abogados<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">*<em>The&nbsp;views&nbsp;and opinions expressed by authors are theirs and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations, employers, or Daily Jus, Jus Mundi, or Jus Connect.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"750\" height=\"266\" src=\"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/2025-10-galo-marquez-ruiz.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-290793\" srcset=\"https:\/\/daily.jusconnect.com\/~www\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/2025-10-galo-marquez-ruiz.jpg 750w, https:\/\/daily.jusconnect.com\/~www\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/2025-10-galo-marquez-ruiz-300x106.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" \/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Chile covers CAM Santiago\u2019s CIAM-CIAR alliance, court challenges, and key investment arbitration developments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":291035,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"format":"standard","override":[{"template":"custom","single_blog_custom":"274736","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"author","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"hide","share_float_style":"share-monocrhome","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_reading_time":"0","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","post_calculate_word_method":"str_word_count","show_zoom_button":"0","zoom_button_out_step":"2","zoom_button_in_step":"3","show_comment_section":"1","number_popup_post":"1","show_post_related":"0","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"crop-500","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-500"}],"trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","disable_ad":"0"},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":"262"},"jnews_social_meta":{"fb_title":"2025 Arbitration Year In Review - Chile","twitter_title":"2025 Arbitration Year In Review - Chile","fb_description":"2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Chile covers CAM Santiago\u2019s CIAM-CIAR alliance, court challenges, and key investment arbitration developments.","twitter_description":"2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Chile covers CAM Santiago\u2019s CIAM-CIAR alliance, court challenges, and key investment arbitration developments.","twitter_image":"291036","fb_image":"291036"},"jnews_review":[],"enable_review":"","type":"","name":"","summary":"","brand":"","sku":"","good":[],"bad":[],"score_override":"","override_value":"","rating":[],"price":[],"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[162,205,262,207,208,164,188,161],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-291033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-americas","category-arbitration","category-chile","category-commercial-arbitration","category-investor-state-arbitration","category-latin-america","category-legal-insights","category-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291033"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291033\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":291038,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291033\/revisions\/291038"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291033"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=291033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}