{"id":290801,"date":"2026-05-31T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-31T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/?p=290801"},"modified":"2026-06-01T23:53:31","modified_gmt":"2026-06-01T21:53:31","slug":"2025-arbitration-year-in-review-egypt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/31\/2025-arbitration-year-in-review-egypt\/","title":{"rendered":"2025 Arbitration Year In Review &#8211; Egypt"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This article was featured in <a title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/legal-intelligence\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jus Mundi<\/a>&#8216;s <strong>2025 Arbitration Year in Review<\/strong>, an annual publication analyzing arbitration developments across 40+ jurisdictions on 6 continents. This edition brings together young practitioners and senior experts to capture the year&#8217;s most significant legislative reforms, enforcement trends, and institutional innovations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-fe48e5de wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/reports\/2026\/02\/2025-arbitration-year-in-review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Download now<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>THE AUTHORS:<\/strong><br><strong>Anwar Nasreldin<\/strong>, Senior Associate at <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/youssef-partners\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Youssef + Partners Attorneys<\/a><\/strong>.<br><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/p\/nouran-salama\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Nouran Salama<\/a><\/strong>, Counsel at <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/youssef-partners\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Youssef + Partners Attorneys<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:30px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In recent years,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/d\/profile\/state\/eg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Egypt<\/a>\u00a0has witnessed a marked improvement in its arbitration landscape, culminating in a series of significant developments throughout 2025. These advancements are most clearly reflected in the introduction of the new CRCICA Rules, a succession of pro-arbitration judicial decisions, and the emergence of high-profile arbitration events. Together, these changes underscore Egypt\u2019s commitment to modernizing its arbitral framework and strengthening its position as a leading venue for international dispute resolution in the region. The following article explores these key milestones and their impact on Egypt\u2019s evolving arbitration environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>CRCICA Rules 2024<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Founded in 1979 under the auspices of the Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (\u201c<strong>AALCO<\/strong>\u201d), the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-crcica-cairo-regional-center-for-international-commercial-arbitration\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration<\/a>\u00a0(\u201c<strong>CRCICA<\/strong>\u201d) is the longest-standing arbitral institution in both Africa and the Middle East. CRCICA has played a foundational role in shaping and advancing international arbitration practice across the region. Over the past four decades, it has evolved into a leading, independent, and neutral forum for the resolution of complex cross-border disputes, contributing significantly to the growth and institutionalization of arbitration in Africa and the Middle East.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In support of Egypt\u2019s broader development as a regional hub for international arbitration, CRCICA has undertaken a comprehensive modernization of its procedural rules. The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/rule\/en-crcica-cairo-regional-centre-for-international-commercial-arbitration-arbitration-rules-2024-crcica-arbitration-rules-2024-monday-15th-january-2024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">new CRCICA Rules, effective 15 January 2024<\/a>\u00a0(the \u201c<strong>CRCICA 2024 Rules<\/strong>\u201d), mark a significant step forward for the arbitration community in Egypt and the wider region. These rules replace a framework that had been in place for approximately fourteen years, and reflect global best practices aimed at promoting greater efficiency, transparency, party autonomy, and cost-effectiveness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As of 31 December 2024, CRCICA has administered a cumulative total of 1,747 cases, including 76 new filings\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/crcica.org\/arbitration\/annual-caseload-reports\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">in 2024<\/a>. This trajectory reflects sustained market confidence in the Centre\u2019s administration and procedures. With the entry into force of CRCICA\u2019s updated procedural framework, the caseload is expected to continue increasing, driven by enhanced efficiency, modernized case-management tools, and alignment with contemporary international practice.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Taken together, these reforms demonstrate CRCICA\u2019s commitment to delivering a modern, reliable, and internationally competitive arbitral framework. They reinforce the Centre\u2019s leadership role in the region and support Egypt\u2019s emergence as a preferred seat and venue for international arbitration.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The summary below outlines the key differences between the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusmundi.com\/en\/document\/rule\/en-crcica-cairo-regional-centre-for-international-commercial-arbitration-arbitration-rules-2011-crcica-arbitration-rules-2011-tuesday-1st-march-2011\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CRCICA Rules of 2011<\/a>\u00a0and the CRCICA 2024 Rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Emergency and expedited procedures<\/strong>: The CRCICA 2024 rules introduced formal Emergency Arbitrator Rules and an Expedited Arbitration stream within the institutional framework, which provides short-term provisional relief before a main arbitration is constituted. The expedited track is designed for faster resolution with a fee scale that is lower than ordinary proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Early dismissal<\/strong>: Tribunals now have clear power to dismiss, at an early stage, claims or defenses that are manifestly without legal merit. This aims to save time and reduce costs by removing clearly meritless issues before full hearings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Transparency on third-party funding<\/strong>: The CRCICA 2024 rules require disclosure in the request (and response) of the existence and identity of third-party funders and of funding agreements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Revised cost structure and arbitrator fees<\/strong>: A flat registration fee was replaced with a tiered registration fee tied to the amount in dispute, arbitrator fee tables were updated, and explicitly discounted fee scales for expedited proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Consolidation\/multi-contract and multi-party provisions<\/strong>: New mechanisms were added or clarified for handling complex factual or contractual matrices, including: consolidation of related arbitrations, multi-contract arbitration, and related joinder-type solutions.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Digital case management and hearings<\/strong>: Online filing and case administration were introduced, express authorization for hearings to be in-person, remote (videoconference), or hybrid, and a broad power for tribunals to use appropriate technological means in the proceedings.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key Case Law Developments\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Administrative Contracts and Ministerial Approval- Egyptian Supreme Administrative Court, Decisions No. 39843 of JY 66, dated 25 June 2024<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Recently, the Supreme Administrative Court underscored that arbitration clauses in administrative contracts are contingent on the explicit approval of the competent minister, without delegation, and that failure to obtain such approval renders the arbitration agreement null and void. In the case at hand, the Court found no evidence of the required approval in the record and, consequently, affirmed the Administrative Court\u2019s jurisdiction over the dispute.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Notably, the Court clarified that the duty to obtain the minister\u2019s approval does not rest solely with the administrative authority. By framing the approval requirement as a mandatory, universally applicable rule that carves out a narrow exception to ordinary judicial jurisdiction\u2014and for which ignorance is no excuse\u2014the Court appears to have raised the bar on the consequences of non-compliance, diverging from earlier decisions that had placed the burden primarily on the administrative authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eastlaws.com\/judgments-full-text\/ar\/egypt\/administrative-supreme\/judicial-year-66\/25-06-2024\/no-39843?type=1&amp;id=1553366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Supreme Administrative Court &#8211; Supreme Administrative Court &#8211; Third Circuit &#8211; Subject &#8211; Appeal No. 39843 of 66 AH | Session Date 25\/6\/2024<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Conversion of Currency in Damages- Egyptian Court of Cassation, Decision No. 32779 and 32790 of JY 93, dated 8 May 2025<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a significant reaffirmation of Egypt\u2019s monetary public policy, the Court of Cassation has clarified the limits of party autonomy in arbitration seated in Egypt, particularly where awards purport to grant compensation in foreign currency contrary to mandatory foreign\u2011exchange rules.<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On 8 May 2025, the Egyptian Court of Cassation annulled an arbitral award in the Appeal nos. 32779 and 32790 for the judicial year 93, after an arbitral tribunal awarded damages in US dollars under a domestic contract. The Court reaffirmed that foreign\u2011exchange rules are matters of Egyptian public policy. An arbitral award granting foreign\u2011currency compensation in contravention of these constraints is subject to annulment under Article 53 of the Egyptian Arbitration Law. This is a limiting precedent: private autonomy (even an agreement on a foreign currency) cannot prevail over mandatory monetary\/public\u2011order rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eastlaws.com\/judgments-full-text\/ar\/egypt\/cassation-civil\/judicial-year-93\/08-05-2025\/no-32779?type=1&amp;id=2095629\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Court of Cassation &#8211; Civil &#8211; Civil and Commercial Division &#8211; Appeal No. 32779 of 93 AH | Appeal No. 32790 of 93\u00a0AH | Session Date 8\/5\/2025\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Strict Interpretation of Article 53 of the Egyptian Arbitration Law- Egyptian Court of Cassation Decision No. 3659 for JY 92, dated 23 June 2025<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This judgment further reinforces the autonomy of arbitration in Egypt by drawing a sharp line between limited judicial review for annulment and impermissible merits review. The court emphasized that Egypt\u2019s Arbitration Law confines annulment to specific, enumerated grounds and does not authorize courts to re\u2011weigh evidence, re\u2011characterize claims, or second\u2011guess an arbitral tribunal\u2019s legal reasoning where the tribunal has applied the agreed law and relevant legal sources. By reversing a partial annulment that intruded on the tribunal\u2019s assessment of limitation and implied waiver, the judgment strengthens parties\u2019 confidence that arbitral awards seated in Egypt will be insulated from merits review. It also emphasizes that tribunals may, under Egyptian law, rely on widely recognized legal maxims set out in the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court of Cassation stated that annulment in Egypt is confined to the exclusive grounds mentioned in Article 53 of the Egyptian Arbitration Law and does not permit courts to revisit a tribunal\u2019s factual findings, contract characterization, or relief\u2014errors of judgment alone are not annulment grounds. Issues like limitation and the legal effect of prolonged silence (implied acceptance or waiver) fall within the tribunal\u2019s remit, and a party\u2019s failure to object in time can signal implicit consent. Here, the tribunal applied the parties\u2019 chosen law, relying on the Civil Code, the Arbitration Law, and CRCICA Rules to assess obligations under the 26 March 2008 settlement, and its use of the maxim that one cannot profit from one\u2019s own wrong\u2014reflected across Egyptian law and permissible under Civil Code Article 1(2)\u2014did not displace the applicable law. Given the record, especially the companies\u2019 silence from 2008 through completion in 2013 and the six years before filing in 2019, the tribunal\u2019s conclusions on limitation and waiver stood, leaving no basis for annulment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eastlaws.com\/judgments-full-text\/ar\/egypt\/cassation-civil\/judicial-year-92\/23-06-2025\/no-3659?type=1&amp;id=3489773\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Court of Cassation &#8211; Civil &#8211; Civil and Commercial Division &#8211; Appeal No. 3659 of 92 AH | Session Date 23\/6\/2025\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Recognition and Enforcement of Informal Arbitration Awards\u00a0-Egyptian Court of Cassation Decision No. 5823 for JY94, dated 17 May 2025<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The following judgment reaffirms that arbitral awards are subject to a self-contained enforcement regime under the Egyptian Arbitration Law (Law 27\/1994). The Court of Cassation held that only the President of the court originally competent (or a delegated judge)\u2014and, for international arbitration, the Cairo court of appeal\u2014may issue the enforcement order for arbitral awards. By treating these jurisdictional rules as matters of public order that courts must raise on their own, the decision prevents ordinary trial courts from re\u2011characterizing arbitral awards or revisiting their merits, thereby strengthening the finality and enforceability of arbitration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court of Cassation ruled that the lower courts erred by adjudicating the merits of a claim founded on an arbitral award, after mischaracterizing the award and related \u201ccustomary session\u201d minutes as a mere private document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It held that a request to enforce an arbitral award in a domestic arbitration is, in substance, a petition to affix the&nbsp;<em>exequatur<\/em>, which falls within the exclusive functional jurisdiction of the President of the court originally competent to hear the underlying dispute (or a delegated judge). This rule is of public order and cannot be waived or altered by agreement.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eastlaws.com\/judgments-full-text\/ar\/egypt\/cassation-civil\/judicial-year-94\/17-05-2025\/no-5823?type=1&amp;id=3540173\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Court of Cassation &#8211; Civil &#8211; Civil Division &#8211; Appeal No. 5823 of 94 AH | Session Date 17\/5\/2025\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key Arbitration Events\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Egypt Arbitration Days 2025<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most important updates in Egypt in 2025 is the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/egyptarbitrationdays.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Egypt Arbitration Days<\/a>\u00a0(\u201c<strong>EAD<\/strong>\u201d), held from 13 to 16 October in Cairo, which is establishing itself as one of the most prominent platforms for arbitration in the MENA region. The event has quickly become a key gathering for anyone involved in arbitration, attracting participants from seasoned arbitrators and in-house counsel to judges and academics. Over four lively days, attendees explored topics ranging from investment arbitration and the protection of Egyptian investors to the evolution of Egypt&#8217;s arbitration law and cross-border mediation. Beyond the sessions, the energy came from informal exchanges highlighting how Egypt is increasingly shaping the future of dispute resolution in a region bridging Africa, Asia, and Europe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Potential Legal Reform\u00a0to the Egyptian Arbitration Law<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It has been over 30 years since the enactment of the 1994 EAL, and during this period, practice on the ground witnessed changes and challenges that revealed the need for urgent legislative intervention to develop it.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As of 2025, there is no new enacted arbitration law replacing Law No. 27 of 1994 (the current Egyptian Arbitration Law (\u201c<strong>EAL<\/strong>\u201d). However,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinsentmasons.com\/out-law\/analysis\/egypt-central-hub-arbitration-mena-region\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">proposed amendments<\/a>\u00a0are underway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The proposed amendments are currently part of a legislative study discussed by the Council of Ministers. The proposed changes to the 1994 EAL include\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinsentmasons.com\/out-law\/analysis\/egypt-central-hub-arbitration-mena-region\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">the following<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Amendment to Article 3:<\/strong>\u00a0Redefine and clarify \u201cinternational arbitration\u201d so that meeting any one of the criteria in the article suffices. The prior\/customary reading required a link to \u201cinternational commerce \/ trade\u201d to qualify arbitration as \u201cinternational.\u201d This aims to avoid inconsistent judicial determinations, and to reduce uncertainty about whether a given arbitration is \u201cdomestic\u201d or \u201cinternational.\u201d<br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Amendment to Article 9:\u00a0<\/strong>Confer exclusive jurisdiction to the Cairo Court of Appeal for arbitration related matters referred to courts under the EAL, whether the arbitration is \u201cdomestic\u201d or \u201cinternational\u201d. This aims at ending the conflict between different Egyptian courts and unifying judicial interpretations.<br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Amendment to Article 54:<\/strong>\u00a0Reducing the time limit for filing an action to annul an arbitral award from 90 to 30 days, and transferring jurisdiction over annulment actions to the Court of Cassation instead of the courts of first instance to ensure expedited adjudication.<br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Amendment to Article 56:\u00a0<\/strong>Make<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>the court referred to in Article 9 (the Cairo Court of Appeal) the exclusive competent court for enforcement of all arbitral awards.<br><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Amendment to Article 58:\u00a0<\/strong>Repeal Article 58(1) of the EAL, which currently bars applications to enforce an arbitral award until the time limit for bringing an annulment action has expired.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Further updates may follow as Egypt continues refining its arbitration framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Egypt\u2019s continued evolution as an arbitration hub is underpinned by a modernized institutional framework, progressive case law, and ongoing legislative reform (&#8220;Hub-formation!&#8221; Youssef&#8217;s guide to transforming MENA seats &#8211; Global Arbitration Review White list \/ Institutions Worth a Closer Look &#8211; Middle East &amp; Africa &#8211; Global Arbitration Review). These developments reinforce Cairo\u2019s position as a leading seat for international arbitration in the region, offering parties a reliable, efficient, and internationally recognized forum for dispute resolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Discover more insights into the latest developments in arbitration in 2025 from around the world now<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-fe48e5de wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/reports\/2026\/02\/2025-arbitration-year-in-review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Download now<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:30px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>ABOUT THE AUTHORS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Anwar Nasreldin<\/strong>\u00a0is a Senior Associate in the International Arbitration Department at\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/youssef-partners\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Youssef + Partners Attorneys<\/a><\/strong>, specialising in international arbitration and arbitration-related litigation. He acts as counsel in proceedings under major institutional rules, including\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-crcica-cairo-regional-center-for-international-commercial-arbitration#publications-rules\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CRCICA<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-diac-dubai-dubai-international-arbitration-centre\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">DIAC<\/a>, and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-icc-international-chamber-of-commercehttps:\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-icc-international-chamber-of-commerce\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ICC<\/a>, and advises on complex commercial and investment disputes. His experience spans all stages of the arbitral process, from case assessment and drafting of core pleadings to hearing preparation, as well as enforcement and annulment proceedings before Egyptian courts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/p\/nouran-salama\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Nouran Salama<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0is a Counsel at\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/firm\/youssef-partners\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Youssef + Partners Attorneys<\/a><\/strong>, specialising in international arbitration and cross-border disputes. She advises regional and multinational clients on complex commercial, construction, and investment matters, and has acted in arbitrations under major institutional rules including the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-icc-international-chamber-of-commerce\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ICC<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-lcia-london-court-of-international-arbitration\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">LCIA<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-crcica-cairo-regional-center-for-international-commercial-arbitration#publications-rules\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CRCICA<\/a>, and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jusconnect.com\/en\/d\/profile\/institution\/en-diac-dubai-dubai-international-arbitration-centre\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">DIAC<\/a>. She combines advocacy skills with regional expertise, supporting clients through all stages of the arbitration process\u2014from strategy and drafting to hearings and enforcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">*<em>The&nbsp;views&nbsp;and opinions expressed by authors are theirs and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations, employers, or Daily Jus, Jus Mundi, or Jus Connect.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Egypt examines CRCICA Rules, pro-arbitration case law, enforcement trends, major events, and reform prospects.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":290807,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"format":"standard","override":[{"template":"custom","single_blog_custom":"274736","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"author","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"hide","share_float_style":"share-monocrhome","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_reading_time":"0","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","post_calculate_word_method":"str_word_count","show_zoom_button":"0","zoom_button_out_step":"2","zoom_button_in_step":"3","show_comment_section":"1","number_popup_post":"1","show_post_related":"0","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"crop-500","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-500"}],"trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","disable_ad":"0"},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":"231"},"jnews_social_meta":{"fb_description":"2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Egypt examines CRCICA Rules, pro-arbitration case law, enforcement trends, major events, and reform prospects.","twitter_description":"2025 Arbitration Year in Review: Egypt examines CRCICA Rules, pro-arbitration case law, enforcement trends, major events, and reform prospects.","twitter_title":"2025 Arbitration Year In Review - Egypt","fb_title":"2025 Arbitration Year In Review - Egypt","fb_image":"290805","twitter_image":"290806"},"jnews_review":[],"enable_review":"","type":"","name":"","summary":"","brand":"","sku":"","good":[],"bad":[],"score_override":"","override_value":"","rating":[],"price":[],"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[166,205,207,231,208,188,161],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-290801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-africa","category-arbitration","category-commercial-arbitration","category-egypt","category-investor-state-arbitration","category-legal-insights","category-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=290801"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290801\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":290804,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/290801\/revisions\/290804"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=290801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=290801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=290801"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=290801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}