{"id":287257,"date":"2025-09-01T16:35:00","date_gmt":"2025-09-01T14:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/?p=287257"},"modified":"2025-09-02T23:07:53","modified_gmt":"2025-09-02T21:07:53","slug":"french-court-of-appeal-reinforces-pro-enforcement-policy-in-alessi-domenico-v-amor-jordan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/2025\/09\/01\/french-court-of-appeal-reinforces-pro-enforcement-policy-in-alessi-domenico-v-amor-jordan\/","title":{"rendered":"French Court of Appeal Reinforces Pro-Enforcement Policy in Alessi Domenico v. Amor Jordan"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

International Arbitration Newsletter <\/strong>
First Semester 2025 <\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

THE AUTHORS<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eglantine Canale Jamet<\/a><\/strong>, Associate at Sygna Partners<\/a><\/strong>
Dayane Darwich<\/strong>, Jurist and Trainee Lawyer at Sygna Partners<\/a><\/strong>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

As a leading Paris-based firm in international law and dispute resolution, <\/em>Sygna Partners<\/a><\/em><\/strong> brings its legal insight to <\/em>Daily Jus<\/em><\/strong>. Through this collaboration<\/a>, we feature select articles from Sygna\u2019s biannual International Arbitration Newsletter, offering sharp analysis of key French court decisions and their broader relevance to the global arbitration community.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Summary<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In 2015, the Italian jewellery company Alessi Domenico sold all of its shares in the Jordanian company Amor Jordan for USD 500,000. On the same day, the two companies concluded a commercial agreement under which Alessi Domenico entrusted Amor Jordan with selling jewellery items in its name in North America and with processing Alessi products destined for sale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2022, Alessi Domenico served Amor Jordan with a demand for payment exceeding USD 1.7 million, corresponding to fifty\u2011six unpaid invoices. The demand, which invited Amor Jordan to settle the dispute amicably, granted a fifteen\u2011day response period. When Amor Jordan failed to reply within that time, Alessi Domenico initiated arbitration proceedings to obtain payment of the invoices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By an award dated 25 June 2024, the arbitral tribunal ordered Amor Jordan to pay USD 2,376,435 (a sum covering the principal of the invoices, fixing differences and default interest), while partly upholding Amor Jordan\u2019s counterclaims by ordering Alessi Domenico to pay a total of USD 1,592,480.83 (including a termination penalty) and dismissing the Jordanian company\u2019s remaining claims. Each party was left to bear its own arbitration costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amor Jordan applied to set the award aside, arguing that its enforcement would seriously prejudice its rights, and Alessi Domenico simultaneously brought the matter before the juge de la mise en l\u2019\u00e9tat<\/em> to have the award recognised and declared enforceable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Concerning the formal requirements of Articles 1514 and 1515 FCCP, the judge noted that the English\u2011language award had indeed been accompanied by a French translation which, although submitted after the initial filing, had been produced sufficiently in advance, more than three weeks, so as to respect the adversarial principle before the hearing of 6 March 2025. As no challenge was raised to the accuracy of the translation, formal regularity was accepted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the merits, the judge recalled that exequatur may be refused only if the award is \u201cmanifestly contrary to international public policy\u201d; the examination must therefore be confined to a reading of the award itself, without revisiting the substance. Amor Jordan relied on an alleged documentary fraud evidenced by a Jordanian accounting report dated 9 December 2024 and covering the period prior to 15 April 2015. Yet that document, produced after the arbitration had closed, had never been brought to the arbitrator\u2019s attention; moreover, it concerned issues (gold inventories, trade receivables and the share\u2011transfer conditions) wholly unrelated to the dispute actually decided, which dealt with performance and termination of the 2015 commercial agreement for the years 2019 and 2020. The juge de la mise en l\u2019\u00e9tat<\/em> therefore concluded that the objections advanced would require a review on the merits, beyond its remit: no manifest breach of international public policy was apparent from the face of the award.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Having rejected this ground, the judge granted full exequatur of the award of 25 June 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As to the application to stay enforcement, made under Article 1526 FCCP, it required proof of serious and present harm to the applicant\u2019s rights. Amor Jordan maintained that immediate payment would cause its bankruptcy under Jordanian law and that the risk of non\u2011restitution was high because Alessi Domenico had no assets in France. However, no recent balance sheet, profit\u2011and\u2011loss account or cash\u2011flow statement was produced; the only evidence was an accountant\u2019s certificate dated 29 January 2025, hypothetically stating that enforcement would create a loss amounting to 278 % of the share capital. The judge held that this uncorroborated document neither demonstrated the company\u2019s true financial position nor established a certain and serious risk; he also observed that Alessi Domenico, being an Italian company within the European Union, operates in a system where recognition and enforcement of judgments are simplified, so that restitution in the event of future annulment cannot realistically be deemed uncertain. The request for a stay was therefore dismissed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Strict Requirements for Suspension: A Deliberate Pro-Enforcement Architecture<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This decision is a concrete reaffirmation of the stringent threshold applied by French courts when parties seek to suspend enforcement of international arbitral awards. French law deliberately sets the evidentiary bar high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since the Decree No. 2011-48<\/a> of 13 January 2011 reforming arbitration, awards rendered in international arbitration proceedings are immediately enforceable, without need for the tribunal to expressly grant provisional enforcement. Article 1526, paragraph 1 FCCP provides that neither an annulment action nor an appeal against an exequatur order suspends enforcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet, Article 1526, paragraph 2 FCCP leaves a narrow procedural safety valve. Where enforcement would \u201cgravely harm the rights of one of the parties\u201d, a judge may halt or tailor enforcement. But case law shows this discretion is rarely exercised: courts have consistently refused stays unless the applicant provides solid and present evidence of irreversible prejudice (See e.g. Paris Court of Appeal, 18 October 2011, Mambo Commodities<\/em>, no. 11\/14286, and 13 July 2012, CIEC Engineering<\/em>, no. 12\/11616). The Alessi Domenico<\/em> ruling thus continues this line of authority: speculative claims or vague fears of bankruptcy, unsupported by financial statements, will not suffice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Award Enforcement as a Policy Choice<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The rigour of the French position is a deliberate policy stance: by making enforcement the default and suspension the rare exception, the French legal system seeks to preserve the international effectiveness of arbitration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The non-suspensive nature of challenges reflects a deeply embedded presumption of the award\u2019s validity. Courts are not to revisit the merits, nor delay enforcement without robust cause. This strengthens legal certainty and deters dilatory tactics. This orientation is part of a broader legal ecosystem favouring arbitration. Under Article L. 512-1 of the French Code of Civil Enforcement Procedures, an arbitral award, even absent exequatur, can justify conservatory measures immediately upon its issuance. This means that the award, while not yet enforceable as a judgment, can already serve as a basis for protective steps such as asset freezing, underscoring the trust placed in the arbitrator\u2019s authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, even where an award creditor has no assets in France, as was the case in Alessi Domenico<\/em>, the judge emphasized that the risk of non-restitution \u2013 should the award later be annulled \u2013 is not presumed. The existence of judicial cooperation mechanisms within the European Union, especially between France and Italy, means that enforcement and eventual restitution are practically and legally feasible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Strategic Implications and Comparative Reflections<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For parties operating in or targeting enforcement in France, the implications are clear. A party seeking to delay execution must assemble a comprehensive, up-to-date, and objectively verifiable record of the alleged harm. That includes recent financial statements, liquidity analyses, and possibly expert reports with quantified risk assessments. Mere assertions or hypothetical risks, however well-written, will not be entertained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under the French model, provisional enforcement is automatic, and the courts are institutionally structured to resist any interference with an award\u2019s immediate effect. The practical result is a pro-enforcement system that makes France one of the most arbitration-friendly jurisdictions globally, not only in theory, but in procedural mechanics and judicial practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Alessi Domenico<\/em> case thus serves not only as an illustration of procedural strictness, but as a reminder of France\u2019s deep-seated legal commitment to ensuring arbitral awards are treated with the same force and effectiveness as domestic judgments, unless clearly proven otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

ABOUT THE AUTHORS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eglantine Canale Jamet<\/a><\/strong><\/strong> joined Sygna Partners<\/a><\/strong><\/strong>‘ International Litigation and Arbitration Department in 2022 as an Associate. She holds a Master\u2019s in Public International Law (Paris Nanterre) and an Advanced LL.M. in International Criminal Law (Leiden). She has gained experience with international courts (ICC and ICJ) as well as in the Legal Affairs Division of France\u2019s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Her practice focuses on immunities and international disputes, with a particular interest in evidence, open-source investigations, and procedural issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dayane Darwich<\/strong> joined Sygna <\/a><\/strong><\/strong>Partners<\/strong><\/a><\/span>\u2019 International Litigation and Arbitration Department in 2022 as a Jurist and Trainee Lawyer. She holds a Master\u2019s degree in International Law and International Organizations (Paris 1 Panth\u00e9on-Sorbonne). She has worked on numerous contentious and advisory proceedings before the International Court of Justice, and has also gained experience at UNESCO. Her work spans a broad spectrum of issues in international law, with a primary focus on international disputes. She has a particular intellectual interest in questions relating to sanctions, territorial matters, the use of force, statehood, and human rights. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors thank In\u00e8s Pilpr\u00e9<\/strong>, Legal Intern, for her valuable work.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

*The views and opinions expressed by authors are theirs and do not necessarily reflect those of their organizations, employers, or Daily Jus, Jus Mundi, or Jus Connect.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Paris Court of Appeal reaffirms France\u2019s pro-enforcement stance: translation rules upheld, suspension denied, and strict proof required to halt arbitral awards.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":287231,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"","format":"standard","video":"","gallery":"","source_name":"","source_url":"","via_name":"","via_url":"","override_template":"0","override":[{"template":"custom","single_blog_custom":"274736","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"author","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"hide","share_float_style":"share-monocrhome","show_share_counter":"0","show_view_counter":"0","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_author":"0","show_post_author_image":"0","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_category":"0","show_post_reading_time":"0","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","show_zoom_button":"0","zoom_button_out_step":"2","zoom_button_in_step":"3","show_post_tag":"0","show_prev_next_post":"0","show_popup_post":"0","number_popup_post":"1","show_author_box":"0","show_post_related":"0","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"override_image_size":"0","image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"crop-500","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-500"}],"trending_post":"0","trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post":"0","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","sponsored_post_name":"","sponsored_post_url":"","sponsored_post_logo_enable":"0","sponsored_post_logo":"","sponsored_post_desc":"","disable_ad":"0"},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":"179","hide":""},"jnews_social_meta":{"fb_title":"French Court of Appeal Reinforces Pro-Enforcement Policy in Alessi Domenico v. Amor Jordan","fb_description":"The Paris Court of Appeal reaffirms France\u2019s strict pro-enforcement stance: suspension of arbitral awards requires solid, present proof of grave harm.","fb_image":"287232","twitter_title":"French Court of Appeal Reinforces Pro-Enforcement Policy in Alessi Domenico v. Amor Jordan","twitter_description":"The Paris Court of Appeal reaffirms France\u2019s strict pro-enforcement stance: suspension of arbitral awards requires solid, present proof of grave harm.","twitter_image":"287232"},"jnews_review":[],"enable_review":"0","type":"percentage","name":"","summary":"","brand":"","sku":"","good":[{"good_text":""}],"bad":[{"bad_text":""}],"score_override":"0","override_value":"","rating":[{"rating_text":"","rating_number":"10"}],"price":[{"shop":"","price":"","link":"","icon":""}],"jnews_override_counter":{"override_view_counter":"0","view_counter_number":"0","override_share_counter":"0","share_counter_number":"0","override_like_counter":"0","like_counter_number":"0","override_dislike_counter":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[205,207,167,179,188,282,161,247],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-287257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-arbitration","category-commercial-arbitration","category-europe","category-france","category-legal-insights","category-sygna-partners","category-world","category-worldwide-perspectives"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=287257"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":287343,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287257\/revisions\/287343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=287257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=287257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=287257"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyjus.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=287257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}