Under UNCITRAL WG III’s reform agenda, Part 2 assesses how the MIC’s state-centered design and high costs may impact investors and the future of ISDS.
UNCITRAL’s MIC reform explores consolidating investment disputes. Balancing efficiency, party autonomy, and safeguards in the EU’s proposed model.
The proposed MIC and appellate body raise questions for ICSID’s future: reform, rebranding, or competition in the evolving ISDS system?
UNCITRAL ISDS reform meets crowdsourcing: designing a multilateral instrument that balances coherence, flexibility, and state choice.
Your daily dose of arbitration and legal industry insights.
Follow Us
